Sales and Sales Management Blog

May 7, 2009

Don’t Get Referrals, Get Introductions

Rick’s client was somewhat uncomfortable with his request.  The sale had gone well enough—everything considered.  There was the matter of the small overcharge on the invoice, but Rick took care of that within minutes of the discovery.  And there was, of course, the issue with the programming that required an additional visit by the technician, interrupting another day of work.  But, all-in-all, the process was certainly less painful than other installations the company had undergone. 

But this last question about referrals was a little uncomfortable.  His client was completely caught off guard.  He wasn’t the least prepared to give a referral and wasn’t comfortable giving one.  Nevertheless, Rick asked and stood his ground until his client coughed up the name and phone number of one of his vendors that might be able to use his services.

Rick was excited; the referral he received was to a company he had wanted to get into for quite awhile.  Better yet, it was a referral to Nadia, the company’s COO, the exact person he had wanted to reach.  He quickly thanked his client and headed to his office to make the call to his new prospect.

As soon as he was in his office, he picked up the phone, called Nadia, and got her assistant who, despite Rick’s insistence that one of Nadia’s clients had asked him to call her, refused to put him through.  Instead, the assistant demanded that Rick leave his name and number and she would pass the information along to Nadia who would call if she were interested.

Rick tried several more times to reach her.  He called and left messages.  He took the liberty of emailing her.  He sent two letters.  Finally, after months of trying, he gave up.

Unfortunately, this scenario is played out thousands of times a day.  Salespeople get “referrals,” thank their client, rush off to call the prospect, and never have the opportunity to make contact.

Why is this such a common result of “referrals?”

Rick didn’t get a referral.  He simply got a name and phone number.  Certainly, from his perspective, he received a referral.  For Rick and most other salespeople, a name and phone number and the permission from the client to use the client’s name as the referring party are considered a referral.  In reality, it is nothing but a name and phone number.

A real referral isn’t simply getting the name and phone number of a potential prospect and the permission of the client to use their name as an introduction. 

By simply getting the name and phone number and running off to make the phone call, Rick committed the most common sin salespeople make when they get a referral.  He failed to capitalize on the power of the referral and instead turned it into a warm call.

The power of a referral is its potential to open doors, to generate interest, to get an appointment.  Seldom can a referral sell for you.  That’s not the goal of a referral.  The goal is to open a door and, hopefully, begin the relationship from a position of strength and trust.

When you receive a referral, you are hoping to build a relationship with the referred prospect based on their trust and respect of your client.  If the prospect trusts and respects your client, a portion of the trust and respect they have for your client is imbued to you because someone they trust referred you.

However, that trust is useless if you fail to connect with the prospect. 

In many cases, the fact someone they trust gave you the prospect’s name and phone number is not enough by itself to convince them to meet with you.  You need something stronger than just your client’s name to open the door.

That extra push is a direct introduction from your client to the prospect.  A direct introduction is powerful for several reasons:
•  It is unusual.  It isn’t often that someone is personally asked by someone they trust to meet a salesperson.  The act itself places you in a different category than other salespeople.
•  It demonstrates trust.  A direct introduction demonstrates a high level of trust.  Most people will not go to the trouble of taking the time and effort to give a direct introduction unless they have a high degree of trust and respect for the person they are introducing.
•  It makes it difficult for the prospect to decline a meeting.  There is implied pressure on the prospect to meet with you since they don’t want to offend the client.

A call using the client’s name doesn’t have the power of an introduction and gives the prospect an easy out—they simply don’t accept your call or decline a meeting.  After all, the client wasn’t really involved—you simply used the client’s name.

On the other hand, a properly executed introduction virtually guarantees a meeting.

In most instances, you have three introduction methods at your disposal:
1.  A letter of introduction written by you for your client’s signature.  A letter from the client to the prospect is the most basic form of introduction.  Rather than asking the client to write the letter, write it for them on their letterhead for their signature.  Let the prospect know what you accomplished for the client; let them know why the client referred you; give a specific time and date to expect your call; and have the client ask them to let the client know their impression of you and your company after the prospect has met with you.

Mail the letter and then a day or two after the prospect should have received it, give them a call.  Don’t introduce yourself first.  Rather, introduce the letter and client first, then move to asking for the appointment.
2.  A phone call from your client to the prospect.  A phone call is stronger than a letter and almost guarantees an appointment as it is very difficult for the prospect to say no to your appointment request while the client is on the line.  The call gives the opportunity for the prospect to ask specific questions of your client and to get detailed information.  Do not have your client call unless you are present—you want to know exactly what was said and you your client to formally introduce you to your prospect.
3.  A lunch meeting with your client, the prospect, and yourself.  A stronger method than either a letter or a call, a lunch meeting allows you to get to know the prospect as a friend before you get to know them as a salesperson.  Like a phone call, it virtually guarantees a private meeting.  Also, in a lunch meeting, your client becomes your salesperson and you’re there as the consultant.  Although a very powerful introduction format, most clients will only agree to do one, maybe two at the most, so use judiciously. 

If you want to turn your “referrals” into real referrals, don’t settle for just getting names and phone numbers.  Learn how to turn those names and phone numbers into real referrals through a direct introduction to the prospect.  Not only will the number of appointments you set go up—your sales will increase, your income will increase, and you’ll find selling to be a lot easier.

Paul McCord may be contacted at pmccord@mccordandassociates.com.

May 6, 2009

FREE is the New Business Black

A few days ago a friend of mine, Jonathan Farrington, posted a question on a LinkedIn group’s discussion page: “Evidently, we are living in a FREE world when it comes to online sales events. Have we seen the end of ‘paid for’ webinars? In what circumstances would it be appropriate to charge for attendance?”   Jonathan’s question reminded me of a blog post by another friend, Dave Stein, from several months ago wondering if anyone would pay to read a blog.

It should be obvious to anyone skimming the internet that ‘free’ is now the one essential element of business for training and consulting companies.  In the vernacular of fashion, free is the new business black—the most basic and essential garment of business.  And free doesn’t mean just articles or blogs.  Internet users are expecting a great deal more for free than a few dozen or even a few hundred articles.  They expect white papers, webinars, blogs, videos, podcasts, eBooks, and even one-on-one coaching consultations.

From my interactions with salespeople, small business owners and professionals, there seems to be a rapidly growing segment of internet users who no longer believe they need invest a dime in order to get all of the management, sales, marketing, communication, leadership, or other training they need because everything they could ever ask for—and more– is free for the taking on the internet.

Although neither Dave or Jonathan have come to a definitive answer that I’m aware of about charging for content, their questions, along with some of the comments and questions I’ve received from readers of my books, articles, and blog, as well as attendees of my teleseminars and webinars, have me wondering if the volume of free information is not only hurting the service firms that do training and consulting, but more importantly, is it hurting the salespeople, professionals, business owners, and executives that are relying on it?

Whilea great many of the readers of the articles, viewers of the videos, and attendees of the free webinars have been convinced that they are getting the training they need, I believe they’re getting duped.  Not intentionally—at least not by most trainers and consultants.  But they are duped none the less because they have been convinced—most often by our hype when we promote our blogs, websites, free webinars, videos, and our other materials–that they’re getting the real deal, the real training.

They’re not, of course.  (Yes, I know ther are exceptions, but they are few and far between)

We’re not non-profit organizations giving our skills, knowledge, insights, and wisdom away for free.  We’re trying to give them enough information to grab their interest, to demonstrate what could be, to convince them to pop for the real deal.  Most of the time, they get an appetizer, but not an entrée.  They get enough information to spur thinking but not enough to fully implement the skill or the strategy.

That, of course is intentional on our part.  We want to impart real information but we can’t give away the store.  Even if we were willing to give it all away for free, it would be difficult to do.  For instance, my book on referrals, Creating a Million Dollar a Year Sales Income: Sales Success through Client Referrals takes 4 hours and 13 minutes to read (audio book version length).  Obviously I can’t really do justice to the whole book in a free hour webinar.  But even those 4 hours doesn’t do justice to the subject of referrals.  I have a two day, 14 hour workshop that goes into much greater depth than the book could ever think of doing.  To convert that workshop into a book would require a 900 page book.  Who is going to read the equivalent of War and Peace on referrals? And we haven’t talked about coaching the behavior; we’re just talking about the information–learning the academics of referrals.

Nevertheless, I have attendees of my free webinar thinking that after 60 minutes they’ll know all they need to know about referrals.  And from a basic point of view they do—they just can’t generate referrals because although they have the basic information, they don’t have the necessary behavior.

We have the same problem with the articles and blogs and videos and podcasts that we do.  We give tidbits and pieces of training and advice, yet we hype it as though it’s going to change their career. We give the information for free but it isn’t usable because the behavior change and the specific application doesn’t come with it, not to mention the fact that the reader or listener many not have the background to understand how to tie the information into their larger business or sales picture. It isn’t personal, it doesn’t fit, it’s not a designer fashion but a Fredericks of Hollywood one size fits all and all of us who have bought a one size fits all garment know that most of the time it really doesn’t ‘fit’ anyone.

A growing number of our target audience isn’t investing in the behavior change, the personalization, the specific application because we’ve hyped our one size fits all material to the point we’ve convinced them they don’t really need it.

In addition, there are a number of users who question what, if anything, we have left of value to sell.  Chris Brogan relates this story: “I finished a conference call a few hours ago with someone who said something that took me aback. Essentially, she said that I share so much on my website that she wonders what else I have to offer. Meaning, if everyone has access to the information I’m providing, why bother going further with me?”

This morning I spoke with a small business owner who corresponds with me via email on occasion but has never engaged my services, who when asked about the topic of this post responded that “if you guys are dumb enough to give everything away for free, I’m not stupid enough not to take it.  I may have to read more or attend more webinars to put it all together, but I can spend a few hours and get for free what you guys want to charge me thousands of dollars for.  Good luck with that.”

Reducing the amount of free content isn’t going to happen.  In fact, the amount, type, and depth of free content will continue to expand.  I doubt that reigning in the hype about the value, content and applicability of the free content will happen either. 

But I can’t help but wonder if our good intentions and desire to compete via demonstrating our value, knowledge, and wisdom is doing more damage to both ourselves and our potential clients.

May 5, 2009

Guest Article: “What Exactly Is Rapport?” by Jonathan Farrington

What Exactly Is Rapport?
by Jonathan Farrington

Rapport is the most important process in influencing others. It is vital if you want to maintain relationships. Without it, you are unlikely to achieve willing agreement to what you want. People who have excellent rapport with others create harmonious relationships based on trust and understanding of mutual needs.

Rapport is the cornerstone of all mutually effective relationships. It needs constant vigilance to keep it alive and effective.

Why Is It So Important?

Rapport is similar to money – when you are short of it, it increases in importance. Without rapport you will reduce your chances of getting:

• Unconditional agreement to your ideas and suggestions

• Full commitment from others

• Business, promotion, fiends

The way in which you interact with others has a major bearing on your success as an influencer.

Being in rapport means that you are in agreement with others both verbally and non-verbally.

Ten Good Reasons To Build Rapport:

• To really win friends and influence people

• To connect rapidly with a wide range of people

• To communicate magically

• To build solid, lasting relationships

• To create incredible results

• To help others improve performance and increase success

• To handle conflict

• To get promotion

• To talk your way in to things

• To talk your way out of things

A Recipe For Successful Influence:

Ingredients:

Trust

Openness

Comfort

Acceptance

Empathy

Flexibility

Something in common

Shared understanding

Method

Mix together as required. Notice changes and be prepared to maintain a flexible approach throughout. Keep communication flowing on all levels.

Self-Disclosure:

Telling others how you feel and what you think and believe, as well as telling them about your background, is a kind of currency. Give out information and usually you will receive a lot back in return.

People swarm, flock and group together by type, background, interests, beliefs, gender, work and so on. And one of the most efficient ways to get close to one another is through self-disclosure.

As we begin to experience a powerful common bond, so too does rapport begin. Mutual interests, ideas, values and beliefs are the wrap and weft of social interaction.

Most people like people who are like themselves!

Biographic Matching:

It is rare for two human beings to be together very long before seeking to discover similarities about themselves. This biographic matching can be social or economic, achieved through outlook, education or background – common experiences of the world.

When you match, you reduce resistance by playing down differences while building on similarities.

Pacing:

Once you are matching one another, you can continue to maintain the rhythm you have created by agreeing with one another, seeing things from the same point of view. Pacing is a conscious continuation of matching.

When talking, you can pace:

• Words that are used

• Tone of voice

• Language patterns

• Volume

• Body language used

Don’t overdo it – you may be accused of mimicry. Be elegant – your skills should remain unnoticed.

Leading

One of the goals of matching and pacing others is to be able effortlessly to lead them in another direction. Once you are deeply in sync with the other people, a change of pace from you will usually result in a similar change in others.

Matching and pacing help you share someone else’s experience and you will begin to know intuitively when it is appropriate to make suggestions, to influence, to lead.

Mismatching

You can also influence behaviour in others by mismatching. It is useful to mismatch when:

• You want a meeting to come to an end – clear up papers, put a pen away

• You want to conclude a telephone conversation – minimise responses.

• You need time to think before acting – use the bathroom, make a telephone call, add up figures on your calculator.

• What you are doing isn’t working – go for a walk, listen to some music, make a phone call.

• Matching is affecting your mood negatively – break off the conversation, change the subject.

Networking

Have you noticed how some people seem to be universally liked, trusted and respected? Chances are that they’re also good at networking – developing a wide network of friends, colleagues, allies and useful contacts.

Networking offers you a structured way of making certain that your ideas are effectively exchanged with others.

And Finally: Networking In Action

How can you get to know your team, other managers and clients better? Are there management associations you could join, luncheon clubs, your local Chamber of Commerce?

Organise team events outside working hours. Be seen at functions, offer to assist whenever you can.

Make yourself known – don’t stand on the edge looking in. Be part of the action.

 

Jonathan Farrington is a globally recognized business coach, mentor, author and sales strategist, who has guided hundreds of companies and thousands of individuals around the world towards optimum performance levels.   He is Chairman of The Sales Corporation, CEO of Top Sales Associates and Senior Partner at The JF Consultancy based in London and Paris.  Visit his blog

May 4, 2009

Book Review: Let’s Get Real or Let’s Not Play, by Mahan Khalsa and Randy Illig

lets-get-real-2The key to success in sales is, according to Mahan Khalsa and Randy Illig, authors of Let’s Get Real or Let’s Not Play: Transforming the Buyer/Seller Relationship (Portfolio: 2008), helping the client reach their goals, that is, putting the client’s success first.

Nice, but hardly a novel sentiment.

We’ve all read dozens upon dozens of books telling us that we must put the client first.  Nothing new here. 

The problem with all those other books is they haven’t given us a workable way to deal with the unspoken but paramount issue separating clients and sellers and preventing us from truly putting our client first—fear.  The client’s fear of being taken advantage of and our fear of losing a sale. 

Creating a way, a path, for us to work with our clients in a format that eliminates the ingrained fears of our clients and ourselves is the primary contribution of Let’s Get Real or Let’s Not Play.

The authors begin their journey in creating a process that will allow us as sellers to really seek our client’s success first and foremost by outlining their 5 key beliefs:

  1. Consultants (sellers) and Clients Want the Same Thing.
  2. Intent Counts More than Technique
  3. Solutions Have No Inherent Value
  4. Methodology Matters
  5. World-class Inquiry Precedes World-class Advocacy

The authors argue that these five key beliefs set the groundwork for a process that will allow sellers to deal with prospects and clients in an honest, straightforward manner where we can work with them to really discover their issues and needs, gather the hard information we need to create a solution that puts our client’s success above all else, and we can do these without the fear of wasting our time and resources pursuing non-business.

Khalsa and Illig devote almost half of the book to discussing how to qualify an opportunity because the qualification process sets the stage for remainder of the process.  As sellers, we must make sure that we a pursuing a legitimate business opportunity.  We cannot afford to waste our time and energy pursuing non-business.  Consequently, we have to qualify based on Opportunity (is it worth pursuing); Time (reasonable and adequate); People (who does what and is it the right mix); Money (can the client afford it); and Decision Process (who, what, when, and how decisions are made).

Exploring each of these areas reveals whether or not we should go forward.  Naturally, getting a green light in each area means we go forward.  A red light in any area means there isn’t a viable business opportunity now.  The real key is looking out for and understanding how to handle yellow lights—situations, questions, and issues that must be fully and honestly investigated to determine whether they are actually red lights or can be clarified into green lights.

The last half of the book is dedicated primarily to discussing how, when and where to present the solution proposal.  At the crux of the proposal is its purpose—to enable a decision.  Everything has lead up to this, the decision enabling meeting.  The authors walk us through the process of creating a meeting plan that leads naturally to making the purchase commitment.  Although useful and well laid out, I found this part of the book to be less compelling than the first half that dealt with qualifying.

The process Khalsa and Illig layout is thorough and workable if not seeming a bit cumbersome at times (the “Quick Reference Guide” in the appendix 16 pages long, hardly ‘quick’).  It does, however, address the fear issues that keep sellers and clients from working together to clarify and address core issues with which the client is struggling. 

Designed for and well worth the read of any salesperson or sales leader engaged in the complex sale, the book is also worthwhile for salespeople and managers engaged in any relationship driven sale, even for those engaged in consumer sales as many of the observations are applicable in numerous sales environments.

May 2, 2009

Thought Leadership Ain’t What It Used to Be

In 1994 when Strategy and Business coined the term thought leader to identify the subjects of its interviews who had made substantial new contributions to the idea base of business.  Those thought leader interviews reserved for a very few and only after they had a serious body of published work in their field that changed their field.

Today everyone claims to be a thought leader.  If you’ve had an article published—or if you’ve just managed to write a coherent sentence on your blog– you’re probably a self-proclaimed thought leader.

Although today I can think of 8 to 12 true thought leaders in business, maybe two or three in marketing and sales, I can find thousands who proclaim themselves to be thought leaders.  I can think of a great many who are effective, who have contributed, who have changed people’s behavior.  But I can only think of a very small handful that I’d consider thought leaders.

As soon as someone called me a thought leader, I made the mistake of claiming that role for myself, just as many others have done.  I wanted to think of myself that way and when someone pinned that term on me I grabbed it.  I claimed it for my own.

Then at some point reality set in.  I realized that as nice as it was to have someone say that about me it wasn’t true.  I wasn’t a thought leader.  Heck, I don’t even personally know any thought leaders.  I know lots of people who have been called thought leaders.  I know many who call themselves thought leaders.  I don’t know any thought leaders, though.

Originally thought leadership was a term earned because of the uniqueness, value and scope of one’s contributions to business, it meant you’d changed business.   Today, it’s just a marketing concept that has caught on very well.

In 1994 the term wasn’t bestowed just because the recipient of the term had had an original thought.  A great many in business have had original thoughts.  Those thoughts might be slight changes in a process or a better way to explain a process; they might be a new way of looking an aspect of a problem or a way to combine a couple of different ideas to better solve an unrelated problem.  All of these new ideas and solutions are worth being recognized, but simply finding a better way to explain something or a little better way of doing something doesn’t rise to the level of thought leadership.  Only when one’s body of work rises to the point of changing the field they are engaged in do they become a thought leader.  Those men and women are few and far between.

In only 15 years we’ve managed to dumb down the idea of thought leadership from someone who has changed their area of business to someone who can create a marketing plan that implants the idea that they are a thought leader.

When everybody’s one, nobody is one.

 

May 1, 2009

Is Being Liked by Your Prospects Really Important?

Filed under: Client Relationships,sales,selling,trust — Paul McCord @ 9:13 am
Tags: , , ,

“There’s nothing in this world more important in sales than being liked by your prospect.”

“A prospect won’t listen to you unless they like you, so if you can’t get them on your side, you can’t create a sale.”

“If they like you, they may listen to you.  If they’ll listen to you, you may be able to get them to trust you.  If they trust you, they just might buy from you . . . .  Everything positive in the sale starts with them liking you, everything negative starts with them not liking you.”

These three statements about being liked were made by three top sales trainers.  Being liked must be the lynchpin to success in selling, right? 

I’ve attended numerous sales workshops and seminars, listened to a great many CD’s, and read dozens of books that all emphasize the critical nature of being liked by prospects and clients. 

On the positive side it is claimed that being liked:

  • opens doors
  • lowers prospect’s defenses
  • makes them want to say yes to please you
  • allows them to trust you

On the negative side they claim that if you aren’t liked prospects:

  • won’t believe you
  • will be suspect of your intentions
  • won’t give you full cooperation

Sounds like being liked really is the key to sales success.

Except it isn’t.

Certainly, being liked is a great asset and by all means we should do all within reason to be liked by our prospects and clients.

But being liked takes a backseat to being trusted and respected.

I suspect that you, like me, have heard many comments such as: “He drives me crazy and is one of the hardest people I know to get along with, but I wouldn’t trust my money to anyone else,” or, “I have to have my assistant deal with him because I just can’t deal with him.  I’d really love to find someone I can work with, but by gosh when he says something I can take it to the bank, and that’s worth a whole lot more than having to put up with him.”

I’ve seen thousands of situations where the salesperson and client weren’t friendly, much less friends; where the client didn’t like the salesperson but was eager to do business with them because they had earned the prospect’s trust.

We work in a profession that has a reputation for being less than honest—for being downright dishonest.  Many, if not all, of our prospects have had numerous bad experiences with salespeople.  They’ve been lied to, ripped off, and taken advantage of to the point they not only have erected a protective wall between themselves, they’ve also dug a mote and stocked it with crocodiles.  They try to avoid us if at all possible, and when they do have to deal with us, they expect us to lie, cheat, and try to screw them to the wall.

Your prospects have met the eminently likeable rip-off artist, the oh so likeable liar, the loveable conman; and as far as they know, you’re him, and if you are, well, that’s just par for the course when dealing with salespeople.

Prospects aren’t surprised to find likable salespeople whom they don’t trust.  That’s the norm.  They even buy from them because they can’t find someone they do trust.  And if you’re going to buy from someone you don’t trust, why not buy from the one you like?

No, being liked isn’t the key to sales success.

But if your prospects find likeable salespeople all around them that they don’t trust, what would happen if they found a salesperson they did trust?  They’d probably react in the same way as those quoted above—they’d be overjoyed to deal with them even if they didn’t like them.

Trust (real trust, not the shallow trust salespeople try to create by faking interest in the prospect by asking a couple of personal questions to find—or fake—common ground upon which to build likeability) is difficult to build and once built, easy to wreck. 

Although trust is one of the most difficult bridges to build with a client, it is the glue that builds lasting clients. 

Charles H. Green has developed an equation for measuring trust.  In the equation, Trust equals Credibility plus Reliability plus Intimacy divided by Self-orientation.  Although all four factors are important, in a sense the self-orientation is the most important.  The salesperson’s focus, whether on the prospect’s interests or on their own self interest, is the key factor in establishing trust.

By all means strive to be liked, but work to establish trust. 

Trust establishes clients and brings in business, being liked makes it more enjoyable.

« Previous Page

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,396 other followers