Sales and Sales Management Blog

November 22, 2010

The Bullshitization of Sales Coaching

Sales coaching is one of the key elements in turning knowing what to do into the actual behavior, the effective conversion of the knowledge into action.  The importance of sales coaching has come to the forefront in recent years thanks to a great extent to people such as my friend Keith Rosen.

Unfortunately, along with the rise of the recognition of the importance sales coaching and the accompanying increase in companies and individual sellers hiring professional coaches, comes the rise of those who want to make “easy” money off of those companies and sellers seeking coaching.  Today there are a growing number of “sales coaches” who have never been in sales or if they have, they have minimal experience.  There are also a number of websites offering “coaching” courses that claim that if you take their course, you too can enter the multi-billion dollar sales coaching industry and make a six figure income in just three to six months.

Selling is a complex activity.  To become a great salesperson means you have to acquire very specific skills; you have to develop a number of characteristics such as self-discipline, focus, curiosity, and a desire to solve problems; you have to have thick skin; you have to be able to overcome adversity.  Selling requires knowledge, skill, character, attitude, and action.  Becoming a top seller isn’t a journey of self-discovery; it is a journey of being taught, of being encouraged, of being corrected, of being pushed, pulled, prodded, and praised.

My friend Dave Brock is in the middle of publishing a great bog series on coaching.  I encourage you to start with his first post and read them all.  My intent here isn’t to duplicate Dave’s work.  Instead of talking in specifics about what sales coaching is and how to coach, I want to contrast what sales coaching in general is vs. what sales coaching isn’t, about the increasing numbers who are turning sales coaching into bullshit–the bullshitization of sales coaching.

I’ve been talking to Keith, Dave, and Jonathan Farrington a good deal recently about sales coaching and where it stands today.  And although we all have the same understanding and view of sales coaching, we each bring our own experiences to the table.  One common experience is noticing the explosion of unqualified “sales coaches” and the equally damaging coaching training courses that promise big money even for the most unqualified who complete their course.

I think Keith said it very well: “There’s the person who has been told and even trained by some of these coaching programs that, ‘You don’t need the answers or the experience to be a good coach.’ This is why you have a large population of unqualified people who think they can coach or simply change their title to ‘Coach.’ Conversely, there’s the coach who realizes you can’t take someone where you haven’t been before. This illustrates the importance of the coach to have not only the experience but is a walking and living model and example of what is possible for their clients to achieve.

Sales coaching is not a Zen self-discovery experience.  Many coaches have been taught, as Keith points out, that they don’t have to know, all they have to do is ask until the client discovers their own personal answer.  Ask the right questions and sooner or later the seller will discover their own unique answer. 

The model of sales coach as Zen Master simply doesn’t work.  Again, I’ll defer to Keith’s description:

“Unfortunately, due to the lack of experience and subject matter of many coaches, they can only speak to the self actualization type of questions and because they’ve never sold before, or managed a team before, or sold successfully or sold in that person’s similar type of selling environment, they don’t even know the right type of questions to even ask. This sometimes leads to ‘killing the client/person with coaching’ as in, continually asking questions until they arrive at the solution themselves. However, sometimes as the coach, you need to provide the answer. Then, it’s the coach’s job to uncover the gap to determine what the right solution is rather than continually asking more questions. For example, if you have a salesperson who never cold called before, coaching isn’t the initial approach. This person needs to be trained in the core competencies and best practices first, in order to develop a baseline before you can refine their performance through coaching.”

The model I think most appropriate for sales coaching comes from sports coaching.  Think Mike Ditka.  For those old enough to remember Ditka as a coach, he didn’t take any crap off anyone.  Yet he was admired and respected by his players.  And he was an extremely effective coach.  Why? 

First, he cared about his player’s success.  Coaching wasn’t a paycheck, it was a passion.  Ditka’s success was tied to his player’s success.  He wanted them to succeed as much as he wanted to succeed himself.  For him to be successful his players had to be successful.  He had skin in the game.

Second, he cared enough to help them become fully prepared to face and conquer the challenges they were to face.  Can you image Ditka standing on the practice field helping a linebacker work through the process of self-actualization to discover for himself the proper techniques to shuck a blocker?  Of course not.  He knew when to guide and when to teach; when to ask discovery questions and when to tell. 

Ditka wasn’t interested in self-discovery; he was interested in instilling in his players the proper attitude, skills, and knowledge that would allow them to reach their goals.  He understood that football isn’t about becoming; it’s about being—being the best you can be.  It is about having and using the skills that lead to great performance. He had a very specific purpose—help his players become the best football players they could be.  If in the meantime, they had an enlightening self discovery, all the better—but not necessary. 

Third, he demanded performance.  Frankly, Ditka didn’t care if the player learned anything new about himself or had a feel good discovery; he cared that the player performed–and whether we like it or not, that’s the exact same demand that is put on every salesperson.  Every one of us is judged on our performance, not whether we have warm/fuzzy feelings about our work or whether we discovered anything new about ourselves that day.

A sales coach, like Ditka, must hold their client accountable and must demand performance.  Warm fuzzies are all well and good but they are meaningless in the sales world.  That’s not to say that a sales coach doesn’t know when to guide through questions or when to give praise and even warm fuzzy feelings.  She does.  But for her, those are far from the only tools at her disposal.  In Dave’s words, “The coach should set high standards and expectations, teach, motivate, challenge, correct, praise, correct, discipline, chastise, ask, tell, coerce, cajole, shame, and sometimes beat the crap out of the person being coached.”  Sounds a lot like Mike Ditka.

Fourth, he had been where they wanted to go.  Ditka knew how to help his players get to the top because he had been there himself.  He knew what it took.  He had paid the price.  He had invested the time and effort and sacrifice to be successful.  He didn’t ask his players to do anything he hadn’t done himself.  He had the experience and credentials to demonstrate that he knew what he was talking about.  He knew the game not just because he had studied it or read about someone else’s experience and learned a bit of lingo, he knew the game because he had invested his life in it.  He lived it.  He had real street cred.

There’s a great deal of bullshit in the sales coaching market today.  Everybody thinks they can be a sales coach because after all, it’s easy, right?  Print up some business cards; learn a bit of sales related jargon–metrics, win/win, customer centric, value added, consultative selling, pipeline, and such; write out a few “discovery” questions you can ask clients; and you’re in business.

If you’re thinking about acquiring a sales coach for your team—or for yourself—take a close look at your options.  Be careful.  The more visibility sales coaching gets, the more bullshitization will take place.  Yes, that former telemarketer who has taken a coaching course and printed a business card may be a whole lot cheaper than that known sales expert, but what you save in a coaching fee now, you’ll have to spend later to get real coaching. 

You need a coach, not a warm, fuzzy experience that leads nowhere.  You need someone who can get you where you want to go, not someone who has read a book or two and learned how to ask a couple of “deep” questions.  You need a Mike Ditka, not the latest pseudo Zen Master.

November 10, 2010

Guest Article: “The Pain & Pleasure of Making Joint Calls,” by Brian Jeffrey

Filed under: Coaching,Sales Management,team development — Paul McCord @ 10:30 am
Tags: , ,

The Pain & Pleasure of Making Joint Calls
By Brian Jeffrey  

If you really want to help your salespeople develop their selling skills while at the same time really annoying them, make joint calls with them.

I’m not suggesting you make joint calls just to annoy your salespeople. What I’m saying is that you will annoy them by making joint calls. That’s because most salespeople think they don’t have anything to learn and that you’re just going along on the call to find fault with their normally flawless performance.

Flawless though they may be, I don’t believe there is a salesperson alive that couldn’t benefit from having someone passing on impartial, constructive criticisms on how they can become even more flawless.

What Annoys
There are two major causes of annoyances. The first is the sales manager’s ego and the second is the sales manager’s lack of people skills.

The ego problem usually stems from the fact that many sales managers got to that position because they were good salespeople, sometimes a star salesperson, and they don’t want anyone to forget it. By the way, just because someone was an excellent salesperson doesn’t necessarily mean they become an excellent sales manager. I’ve seen a number of situations where the company has promoted their best salesperson into sales management only to lose their best salesperson and get their worst sales manager! Sales management requires a different set of skills in addition to being able to sell.

An inappropriate ego will cause two problems:

1. Because the sales manager fancies himself as one of the world’s greatest salespeople, he feels that no one can sell as well as he does and therefore every comment that comes out of his mouth is a critical one.

2. The second ego-triggered problem is the tendency to show off. This manifests itself in the sales manager taking over the sale at the first sign that things aren’t going as well as he wants them to go. Smart salespeople catch on to this fact real fast and make sure that they say or do something early in the call that triggers off the sales manager’s desire to take over the call. Now the focus is off the salesperson and all he has to do is sit back, relax, and let the sales manager handle the rest of the call. There will be little or no criticisms during the post-call critique as the salesperson didn’t really do anything.

I’ve seen major disasters when both the sales manager and the salesperson allow their egos to take over control of their logic and the situation. It becomes a clash of the Titans. The prospect quickly begins to realize that something odd is going on here as the ego’s clash and the two people start contradicting each other or get into a outright argument. Talk about a sales call going bad. No sales call should ever require a referee!

No People Skills
Some sales managers excel at the management part of the job and are less able at the leadership part. In other words, they’re more managers than they are leaders. It’s always been my opinion that you manage processes but you lead people. You lead people by understanding them, where they’re coming from, where they want to go, and then use that information to affect, rather than force, change.

Telling someone that they really screwed up the last sales call hardly has the desired effect of creating positive change. It may, however, have the effect of causing the salesperson to change jobs to a more pleasant working environment.

A better approach would be to ask the salesperson for her impressions of the call and to use your questioning skills to draw out what went badly and what needs to be done to avoid it happening in the future. Trust me on this, but most good salespeople will be harder on themselves that you can ever be. Of course, if you’ve got a prima donna whose ego interferes with her internal eyesight, then you may have to verbally whack her on the side of the head to get her attention. Most salespeople know when a sales call didn’t go as well as it should and after their shields are down, they’ll discuss it rationally.

Avoiding Problems
By this time I’m sure you’ve probably figured what to do or, more importantly, what not to do to avoid most of these problems, but here’s a few more ideas.

Remember, it’s the salesperson’s call, not yours. If the call is going bad, let it go. Use the call as a learning experience. Mind you, if you find that you’re having a lot of learning experiences with a particular salesperson, maybe you have a slow learner who should be given another career opportunity.

Makes notes during the call. Use these notes in your post-call critique. Focus on any positive points before embarking on the downside of your critique. Ask the salesperson what she felt went well and then ask what she felt she could have done better. If she covers all the points you wanted covered from your list, terminate the critique and move along to the next call. Resist the tendency to flog a dead horse.

If a sales call goes particularly well, take the time to compliment the salesperson before moving on to the next call. An occasional pat on the back can have a lot more impact than a kick in the butt.

If you want even more ideas on handling joint calls, read my article on How to Curbside Coach.

How Often
One of the major differences between a manager’s job and a sales manager’s job is that the sales manager shouldn’t spend all his time behind a desk or in meetings. Sales managers have to get out and “press the flesh” as the saying goes. They have to get out with their people, and I don’t mean out to the local pub at the end of the day. I mean out with your salespeople in front of real prospects.

I recommend that you put aside a half day per quarter to make joint calls with each of your people. That’s frequent enough to stay on top of any potential problems and not too frequent to really annoy anyone.

The pleasure part of making joint calls comes from seeing your coaching pay off with increased confidence on the part of your salespeople and even more closed sales that impact your bottom line.

But remember, you can’t have the pleasure without suffering the pain. So, why not get out and hurt a bit today? It can pay big dividends.

Brian Jeffrey, CSP, is a Certified Sales Professional with over 40 years experience in sales, sales management, training, and business consulting. Formerly co-founder and president of SalesForce Training & Consulting Inc, Brian and his business partner have started a new company, Salesforce Assessments Ltd. This new company works with sales managers who want to make the right hiring decisions and build a strong team using an online assessment.

September 8, 2010

Guest Article: “Do You Need a Sales–Consultant, -Coach, or -Trainer?” by Christian Maurer

This is the first time I’ve had the chance to feature an article by my friend Christian Maurer.  Be advised that English is not Christian’s first language–so if a sentence comes across as a little awkward, live with it.  His oral and written English is better than most of us native speakers.

——————————————————————————————–

Do You Need a Sales-Consultant, -Coach or -Trainer?
by Christian Marurer

Is this differentiation necessary when you are looking for help with your initiative to increase sales productivity?

The fact that all three terms are listed on many LinkedIn profiles (mine included) can mean two things. Either, it suggests that the terms are taken as interchangeable and listing them all gives a higher chance to be found depending of the preferred term used by those seeking help. Or, these are three different roles.

I believe these are different roles needed for different phases in your initiative. I have listed them on my profile to indicate that I can assume all three roles.

Consultants
have a deep knowledge of their field. They have tools to diagnose the root causes of sales productivity problems. Based on the diagnosis, they can then design a therapy plan how to eliminate the detected inhibitors for higher sales productivity. They have a methodology how to do this. The therapy plans are based on modules that can be mixed and matched, extended or contracted depending on the diagnosis. Only few sales consultants stop their service offering at this level. Most of them will then also help with the execution of the therapy plan. They will then take on the roles of trainers and coaches.

Consultants are best engaged early in the initiative or when derailed initiatives need to be brought back on course.

Consultants can even help you deciding whether an initiative is needed or not. In this case, both parties must understand that the diagnosis is a free standing separately billable item and that the engagement might end after the diagnosis phase.

It might also be advisable to consider the development of the therapy plan as a separately payable free standing engagement. The customer then has a higher guarantee that the consultant is not just trying to peddle his/her teaching and coaching services and will recommend third parties if this improves the execution of the plan.

The term consultant is also used for people giving you advise how to implement a prepackaged methodology , process or piece of software to improve sales productivity. Their diagnostics are geared to confirm the fit between their solution and a problem. Getting help from this type of consultants in early phases of an initiative bears the risk, that they might see every problem as a “nail”, because the only tool they have is a “hammer” (their particular offering).

Trainers
have internalized a body of knowledge (best practices) how to improve sales efficiency and/or effectiveness. They transfer their knowledge to their trainees through lecturing, case studies, tests and practical exercises. They do this in classrooms, interactive web based sessions or a blended combination which might also include self paced learning modules. They have their own intellectual property (body of knowledge) or are certified to use the material proprietary to a third party.

Organizations not wanting to use consultants to carry out a diagnosis to help shape their initiative and engaging trainers only and maybe consultants advising on the use of a particular solution, rely on a self diagnosis of the problems. They must accept that the cause for potential failure of the initiative is not always the training. It is as likely that the failure is caused by a superfluously carried out diagnosis or by jumping prematurely to conclusions.

Coaches
have an intimate knowledge what best practice behavior, leading to higher efficiency and/or effectiveness looks like. They observe those to be coached in real life situations or role plays or they review outputs (e.g. plans) and identify gaps between what they observe and best practice. They then advise the person to be coached what behavior changes are needed to get closer to best practice. Coaching is usually an iterative process. The coach will observe how well the advise is internalized and has improved behavior and will recommend further changes if gaps are still significant. This loop will be repeated until gaps have disappeared or have at least reached a tolerable level.

For a coach to be effective, there must be an agreement between the customer and the coach, what best practices had previously been taught and need reinforcement.

Using trainers who taught best practices as coaches,assures knowledge about the best practices to be reinforced. Knowing how to train best practices does though not mean automatically also knowing how to coach best practices. There is a difference in approach. Trainers used as coaches might also earlier come to the conclusion that gaps are so huge that refresher training or re-training is needed before coaching can be effective.

Conclusion
Distinguishing the three roles and understanding which role is needed when in a sales productivity improvement initiative and what the prerequisites are, gives a higher certainty for a successful outcome.

Within each role, there are though also variants to be considered. Ignoring these variants, might also cause the initiative not delivering the expected results.

When you seek help to improve sales productivity, do you make the distinction of roles?

How would you describe these roles?

Do you have experience on this topic you would like to share?

Christian Maurer is a consultant, coach and trainer, who helps B2B sales leaders, who admit performance problems of their organizations, to define and implement solutions based on new thinking. Christian works with Fortune 500 companies as well as with local and regional champions. He conducts business in German, English and French. He is  a frequent speaker in events organized by the Institute for Marketing and Retail of the University of St. Gallen , Switzerland and a member of the visiting faculty of ZfU International Business School in Thalwil, Switzerland.  Visit his blog.

September 4, 2010

Guest Article: “How Great Managers Recognize The Right Opportunities for Coaching,” by Keith Rosen

How Great Managers Recognize The Right Opportunities for Coaching
by Keith Rosen

Where do you look for and uncover that ‘perfect’ coaching moment? How do you recognize where your direct reports need coaching and could benefit from the coaching most?

Actually, uncovering what you can coach someone on, from a tactical perspective, is actually the easy part. Managers are pretty good at recognizing problems, needed strategies and desired outcomes. However, it’s uncovering the why (the real source of the issue) and the who or the often very elusive and limiting thinking, assumptions or outlook people have which is ultimately preceding and driving their actions and behavior that is the tricky part and why many of the strategies and answers managers share either do not work or work well enough to become the long term solution. (If you’ve ever found yourself delivering ‘repetitive coaching’ or having the same conversation with your direct reports, that’s a sign that you haven’t gotten to the actual source of the issue or you’re spending your time on the wrong issue, digging in the wrong hole with no treasure to be found.)

Demonstrating this ability to get to the core of the right issue that leads to measurable and positive change is a true testament of an exceptional coach. The good news is, you can learn how to more precisely uncover those exceptional opportunities to deliver timely, relevant and powerful coaching. Here are some ideas that will guide you on the path to do so.

Regardless of the topic, skill, problem or mindset you’ve identified as a possible focal point in your coaching, there is one factor that’s always applicable in every coaching scenario. It also happens to be the very thing each coaching opportunity has in common. That is – The Gap.

The Gap is the space that exists between where the person is today and where they want or need to be or what is possible for them to achieve. It’s the void that exists between the person and their goal or solution; and where the coaching opportunity will evolve from that they often cannot see on their own. As a coach, it’s your responsibility to identify and fill in this Gap. The question is, how, exactly, do you accurately uncover this Gap?

There are three primary ways you can identify the Gap.

1. Through Observation. It’s essential that every manager takes the time to observe their direct reports in the field or on the phone, presenting or interacting with their customers and prospects. This is one of the most essential activities any manager can engage in. Otherwise, you run the risk of relying solely on what you hear from your salespeople and while it may be a truth, it’s only a subjective or partial truth or piece of the puzzle based what they see solely through their eyes. Like a great sport coach on the sidelines, observation will help identify the ‘blind spots’ that every salesperson has in order to get a full panoramic view of the most objective truth and what is really going on. After all, it’s very difficult to self diagnose when you’re in the middle of the game.

2. Through Conversation. Whether on the telephone or face to face, regardless if this happens during normal conversation or a scheduled coaching session, the Gap can also be identified in every interaction you have. Creating the safe space that allows people the time to process their thoughts, challenges and feelings on their own encourages a deeper level of self awareness which fosters more accurate self diagnosis and strengthens their problem solving skills. While certain strategic opportunities, skill gaps, assumptions or misconceptions can be identified, keep in mind; any great coaching must be complemented with observation so that you have the first hand evidence of what is really going on without relying solely on one source – the person you are coaching.

3. Through Evaluation and Inspection. While many managers hide behind and rely too heavily on diagnosing problems through inspection and the analysis of reports, spreadsheets and data, it is ironically often the least effective of these three strategies managers count on to uncover the Gap. Even conducting peer to peer or customer interviews to gain further insight about your direct report, while immensely valuable, still only provide you with a portion of the story. However, when used in conjunction with the other two strategies, this becomes another useful complimentary component to identify where certain activities, results and skills may be lacking. Keep in mind, data only shows you what is going on and can also be subjective. It doesn’t tell you why it’s happening. As such, observation and coaching conversations must also be leveraged to get the full story, rather than a small portion of the story to uncover the specific areas you can coach someone on. Remember, you are, first and foremost a people manager, not a data manager.

Instead of sharing what you perceive to be the solution to a problem before understanding the person’s specific needs, challenge or root cause of an issue, rely on deeper questions to assist in recognizing the Gap in every coaching conversation or situation with your staff. Whether the Gap is identified by you or the person you’re coaching, this will elevate your awareness so that you can pinpoint what is really going on with laser-like accuracy.

Any great coach realizes there’s not just one ‘right answer’ when coaching or only one way to uncover a powerful coaching moment. Leveraging these three distinct approaches will ensure that you are precisely coaching to the relevant Gap. Moreover, it will demonstrate the importance of investing the proper time to uncover a meaningful coaching opportunity rather than one that is hollow, inaccurate and ineffective. Improving your accuracy in uncovering the proper Gap to coach on will facilitate the changes in behavior that will lead to improved performance – and masterful coaching.

Keith Rosen is fanatical about increasing your sales and helping you achieve what matters most to you. That’s why almost half of the Fortune 1000 Companies and the top companies in six major industries chose his training and coaching solutions. He is the Executive Sales Coach that top salespeople and managers call first to attract more prospects, close more sales and develop a team of top performers. Visit his website.

May 7, 2010

Guest Article: “Nine Barriers to Coaching a Sales Team,” by Keith Rosen

Nine Barriers to Coaching a Sales Team
by Keith Rosen

For any executive sales coaching initiative to be effective and long-lasting, there are important obstacles that a manager or internal sales coach needs to address.

Barrier One: No Coach the Coach Program

One of my clients recently called me with questions about building an internal coaching program. It seems the person who was spearheading the initiative was having a difficult time putting the processes and procedures together as well as getting the managers to embrace the new philosophy and approach. Since the company felt they could build the internal coaching program on their own, they didn’t hire an outside expert or consultant. The person in charge of the initiative wasn’t even a coach but someone in HR. Without a coach training program to develop coaching skills and competencies, you can change your managers’ titles, but not their essence, their thinking, or their skills.

Barrier Two: Coaching Is a Choice—Not an Obligation

The coaching relationship is a choice, not an obligation. The relationship between the coach and the people who are coached is a designed alliance, a collaborative partnership, and more. As such, remedial or sanctioned coaching is often met with resistance rather than with open arms. How is coaching being offered to your team or to your employees? As a perk, an incentive, an option, an obligation, or a remedial response to under performance? Are you offering it to your entire team, to a select few, or to just one person?

Barrier Three: Surrender Your Agenda When Coaching

What if your boss walked up to you today and said, “Your career, your bonus, your position in this company, and your salary will depend on how well your team performs. That said, I want you to start coaching all the people on your team, one on one. Hold them accountable and be unconditionally supportive, while surrendering your agenda and maintaining objectivity.” Could you do it?

My clients consist of a myriad of companies and professions, all shapes and sizes, selling products and services in practically every industry and profession. Yet, the one truth I share with them is this: “When you work with me as your coach, this will be the only relationship you have where it will always be 100 percent about you.”

If you’re an internal coach, this may be a stretch to fully surrender any agenda or attachment to your sales team’s performance, especially since their performance directly reflects on you. In such cases, there’s an inherent challenge for you, as the business owner or manager, to separate your agenda from theirs and have no personal expectation from the relationship other than your unconditional commitment to their continued growth and success. It’s going to take some adjustment on your part to develop an unconditional and authentic relationship with your salespeople.

Barrier Four: You’re Coaching People, not Changing People

There’s a big difference between coaching people and changing people. However, for executives or front line managers who are commissioned to hit some aggressive sales numbers, coaching is the last thing they want to talk about. The real distinction is that coaching is a process of discovery. A coach cannot push for results or attempt to change people overnight. The traditional scenario to facilitate change is typically a stressed-out manager who lays the same stress on his salespeople that his boss dumped on him. “Work harder; get focused; our jobs can be on the line; just bring in some more business.” This hollow approach seldom drives change.

Barrier Five: Connection—It Has to Be the Real Thing

In coaching it’s critical for unrestricted, honest communication in the coaching relationship. It’s extremely challenging to connect with your salespeople at a deeper level, the type of connection necessary between the coach and the person being coached. Many employees are afraid that if they disclose too much, it will be held against them in the future. So they limit their vulnerability level to what is absolutely needed to perform their job function. This restricts safe and open communication, limiting the chance to connect with your people in a way that allows coaches to get to the real issues and barriers;—barriers that are preventing improved performance.

Barrier Six: Confidentiality and No Judgment? Sure, Boss!

Lets get right to what you’re thinking. Your role as supervisor or boss presents some inherent problems with coaching that need to be addressed head on.

Given the parameters, guidelines, and principles necessary to be a masterful coach, trust is critical to make the connection. After all, if your employees can’t trust you as their manager, forget even trying to coach them. Coaching requires an elevated level of trust that transcends the superficial trust between employees and management.

And what if some of your salespeople already have a problem with you as their boss and now you’re going to try and coach them? How does that get handled? Do you think any of your employees are going to just come out and say that? Think again.

As a result, this relationship could quickly turn into more of a mentoring rather than a coaching relationship. This is a major reason why companies bring in an expert coach from the outside who doesn’t have any direct ties to the company as a manager would.

Barrier Seven: Anyone Can Manage, Not Everyone Can Coach

“I’m really not cut out to be a coach.” The hard fact is there are managers who want to be coaches, managers who need to be coaches, and managers who shouldn’t be coaches, and probably shouldn’t be managers, either.

Companies that force all managers into a coaching role make a costly assumption that all of their managers would actually make great coaches, just like every college athlete should automatically make the pros. The rules work the same. Desire, attitude, ability, and skill will always be the formula for becoming a successful coach, or athlete. Then there is the mistake of pushing managers to do something they don’t want to do. Managers can easily sabotage their own coaching efforts, and in the end, corporate may learn the wrong lesson: “I guess our internal coaching program didn’t work.”

Barrier Eight: Full Accountability

If you want to become powerful, hire a powerful coach. It’s a simple, yet highly effective strategy. If you want your salespeople to be powerful, you need to be a good role model for them. As you evolve, so does your team. Consider this truth: Your team is a reflection of you. If you’re not prepared to be 100 percent accountable for the success and failure of your team, if you skirt accountability in any way, if you lack professionalism or proficiencies in certain areas, your team will reflect these weaknesses. If you choose to evolve, so will your salespeople. If you want a world-class sales team, you have to become a world-class executive sales coach.

Barrier Nine: Competitive Managers

The most effective leaders develop other leaders. They encourage their people to perform as well as they do—even better. That is the sign of a true master and the real testament of a great manager. But what if the manager perceives his coworkers and subordinates as a threat? What if the manager is driven strictly by ego, the need to prove himself and his worth? What if this manager thinks he has survived only by keeping a competitive distance from his peers and salespeople? I’ve known managers who don’t share their tools and best practices with their salespeople for fear their salespeople will outdo them. These are likely to be inferior managers who will seek to selfishly leverage the coaching relationship in a way to better themselves and their position rather than for the betterment of their sales team.

Now that we’ve listed the barriers that can get in the way of implementing an effective internal coaching program, do not be disheartened. With greater awareness comes choice. The good news is, you possess the power to make a difference.

Keith Rosen is the executive sales coach that top managers, sales professionals and executives in many of the world’s leading companies call first. As a prominent, engaging speaker, Master Coach and well-known author of many books and articles, Keith is one of the foremost authorities on assisting people in achieving positive, measurable change in their attitude, in their behavior and in their results.  Visit his website

November 13, 2009

Not Sure if Coaching is Right for You or Your Sales Team? Take a Test Drive to Find Out

Filed under: Coaching,sales,selling,small business — Paul McCord @ 10:45 am
Tags: , , ,
Not sure if coaching is right for you or if I’m the right coach for you? Afraid of investing a ton of money and then discovering you’ve made a mistake?

Hay, I understand.

Engaging a coach is a major step. Coaching isn’t cheap and it can have an immense impact on
your business and success.

So how do you determine if coaching is right for you or your team or if I’m the right coach?

Take a coaching test ride.

Trial Coaching for Individual Sellers or Sales Leaders
Before you engage my services in a three, six or twelve month contract, invest only $200 and get three full coaching sessions to help you determine if this is right for you.

What are the three sessions?
Session One: Exploring your coaching goals and objectives
Session Two: Setting out your coaching plan with specific, measurable goals
Session Three: Coaching session

Each session is an hour long and each has a homework assignment that builds upon the session and works toward the next session’s objectives.  Between sessions I’m available via email or in a real emergency, via phone.

Have a Sales Team that Needs Coaching?
Would you rather have group coaching for your team?  Certainly is less expensive that a whole host of individual coaching contracts and as long as the coaching goals and objectives are the same for each member of the group, small group coaching works very well.

Group coaching is appropriate for groups of 3 to 10 sellers and the format is virtually the same as for individual coaching.

Small group test drive is only $500—again, about a 67% discount over the normal price for.

Beginning Sunday you can log onto http://www.mccordandassociates.com/coaching_special.html and get more detailed information and/or register for the test drive.  This special will remain open until I’ve filled the three coaching openings I currently have.

August 19, 2009

Boost Your Sales: “Five Ways to Make Coaching Professionals to Sell More Efective,” by Ford Harding

Filed under: Coaching,sales,selling — Paul McCord @ 7:20 am
Tags: , , ,

Five Ways to Make Coaching Professionals to Sell More Effective
by Ford Harding

At professional service firms (accounting, actuarial, architectural, engineering, law, management consulting firms and their like) sales management is one of the many responsibilities of practice and office heads.  These people must also market the firm’s services, sell work, do billable client work, run their offices or practices, and do many other things.  Often, they are rainmakers, the word used in the professions to describe super salespeople.  They don’t have much time for coaching.

The people they coach are also not typical salespeople.  Generally, they are more highly educated, are initially recruited for technical or creative rather than sales abilities, and sell on a part-time basis while doing billable client work.  Not having chosen their careers with a desire to sell, they are only asked to do so after years of providing services to clients who respect their expertise and listen to them.  Expected to stand up to senior client executives when necessary, many are strong-willed.  In short, their experiences and interests are not designed to make them effective sellers.

It is hardly surprising, then, that sales coaching in the professions is often ineffective.  Having spent years coaching professionals to sell, Harding & Company suggests the following to get better results:

1.  Supercharge your marketing meetings: Weekly or monthly marketing meetings in most professional firms are deadly.  Deadly!  They consist of one participant after another reeling off lengthy and meandering descriptions of the work they are pursuing.  Fifteen minutes into the meeting, 90% of the participant’s have zoned out, thinking more about what they will say when it comes their turn or about the client deadline they are rushed to meet, rather than about what the current speaker is saying.  This is wasteful.  Wasteful of the participants’ time and wasteful of perhaps the greatest opportunity available to the practice or office head to coach.

Except in special cases, reports on current pursuits should be limited to 60 seconds each.  Time freed up this way can then be devoted to building morale by recognizing successes, drawing lessons from participants’ recent experiences and some just-in-time training.

2. Recognize that different people will succeed in different ways.  Rainmakers tend to feel that their method for making rain is the only or the best one.  They have their own history of success to prove it.  They sometimes don’t realize that what works for them, when they are at the peak of their careers with established reputations and client bases, is not necessarily the best for more junior people with different personalities and capabilities.  I recently heard one highly successful rainmaker advise more junior staff members to “nuke” clients who got in the way by going over the clients’ heads to their bosses and reporting the obstacle.  It worked for him, but few of the more junior people could have pulled it off.  There would be disastrous consequences had they tried.  I have often heard rainmakers say that a particular professional doesn’t speak up enough at sales meetings.  The person in question is often a great listener who becomes an effective seller exactly by not speaking up too much.

3.  Help them recognize small successes: Developing a client base and a consistent flow of new work is a marathon not a sprint.  Staying power over time determines success as much as anything.  Aspiring rainmakers often judge their success only in actual new business won, e.g. the big successes.  But business development is an area where big successes will not come less you have many small ones along the way.  By recognizing the small successes, rainmakers can see the progress they are making, and those small successes sustain them between the big ones.  When aspiring rainmakers learn to do the same, they have taken a big step towards their ultimate transformation to rainmakers.  Part of your job as a coach is helping them recognize and celebrate small successes as they occur.  Did the aspiring rainmaker meet the CFO at an important client?  That’s a solid small success.  The CFO doesn’t realize it yet, but he will know the aspiring rainmaker for the rest of his natural life.   Only death will set him free.  Did a client open up and share confidences with the aspiring rainmaker for the first time?  Or did he spend an afternoon on the golf course with her for the first time?  These are small successes, too, and the aspiring rainmaker needs to learn to see them as such.

4.  Help them depersonalize setbacks, failures and ambiguous messages from the market:   Professionals as a group are extremely hard on themselves.  In their client work most expect to succeed 100% of the time.  (Litigators and executive recruiters are examples of exceptions to this general rule.)  Though they logically know that they cannot expect to succeed at winning every sale, emotionally, lack of success feels like failure.   When something doesn’t go right, they quickly blame themselves.  When a prospective client doesn’t return a call, they assume that if reflects the client’s lack of interest or dislike..  If a client hires a competitor, they assume that is must be due to some personal failure.  Certainly, they must learn to evaluate their own sales performance, but instinctively beating oneself up after every perceived setback will quickly drive a professional away from selling.

Good sales coaches help aspiring rainmakers depersonalize those things which should not be taken personally.  Unless you do this, as many as half of the people you coach will give up long before they can expect to see results.

5.  Help them protect the time they need to develop business.  Professionals cite lack of time as the most serious obstacle to their rainmaking more often than any other reason.  Time can be a real problem or just a handy excuse, and often it is both.  Expected to make their clients happy and to achieve high utilization rates to ensure their firm’s profitability, they feel intense pressure to put billable client work before all else.  Indeed, they are often told to do so, both in so many words and indirectly in the way that many small decisions are made about how they use their time.  If they feel diffidence or aversion to selling, lack of time is an easy out.  Unless you help them overcome the time issue, you will be an ineffective coach.

As the preceding paragraph suggests, there are both logical and emotional aspects to the problem, and your coaching must address both.  So, you can suggest practical ways that they can get business development benefit from billable time.  For example, suggest that Instead of calling a client with an answer to a question that they go see him.  They will have a different quality of conversation if they do.  Suggest that while visiting a client that they drop by the office of one of her colleagues to say a quick hello.  You can help them find activities to unload to make time available for business development.  For example, some professionals need to offload assembling their travel expenses to an assistant.  You can help them organize their effort, so they can use scarce time more efficiently.  For starters, they need a consolidated and regularly updated contact list.

But these logical steps won’t remove emotional barriers.  To do that you must help the aspiring rainmaker reset priorities.  A conversation with one young professional revealed that his primary need to sell more work derived from a need to make partner so that he would have the financial resources to pay for the education of four children.  We took the picture of his children down from his bookcase and placed it next to his phone with the understanding that he would look at it, whenever he was tempted to avoid making business development calls.  He began to make his calls consistently. 

If your sales coaching is not as effective as you would like, perhaps you should revisit your priorities, too.  If you write a clear one-or-two-sentence statement of why developing more rainmakers is important to you, perhaps you will find it easier to find the time to focus your attention on the effort and to try these steps.

Ford Harding in the founder of Harding & Company which helps professionals make the transition from doing and managing client work to selling it.  He is the author of Rain Making: Attract New Clients No Matter What Your Field [Adams Media] and Creating Rainmakers [Wiley].  His blog can be found at www.HardingCo.com/blog and he can be reached at fharding@HardingCo.com

August 17, 2009

Boost Your Sales: “Coaching Sales People to Success,” by Steven Rosen

Filed under: Coaching,sales,Sales Management,selling — Paul McCord @ 6:06 am
Tags: , , , ,

Coaching Sales People to Success
By Steven Rosen, MBA

One of the most overused terms in sales management is sales coaching. Yet sales coaching is one the least understood activities that sales managers do. Many sales executives and managers talk about the importance of coaching salespeople and only a few truly understand what it is and how to effectively do it.

Most sales executives that I speak with agree that sales coaching is an essential  component of driving sales performance. Studies show that sales coaching alone contributes to a 19% increase in sales. How many companies would love to get another 20% more sales in this economy?

For the purposes of this discussion, here is the foundation for defining sales coaching and illustrating how sales managers can coach sales people to success

1. What is the role of the sales manager?
Sales organizations struggle with a fundamental question: What is the role of the front-line sales manager? Many sales executives define it  as driving sales results or “bringing in the numbers.” This is true, but the real question is how to do that. In my view the role of the front-line sales manager is selecting, developing and retaining top sales performers. If they are effective in this role they are truly maximising sales performance and results will come.

2. What is sales coaching?
Developing top performing salespeople comes from effective sales coaching. This is a dynamic process that is shared between a sales manager and a sales rep. It is specific to the individual salesperson and happens in the field: I coach sales managers in a simple four-step process for, in turn, coaching salespeople to success:

ü  Step 1: Observing, self awareness and diagnosing

ü  Step 2: Gaining a commitment to skills/behaviors to focus on

ü  Step 3: Developing a plan of action for improvement

ü  Step 4: Closing the accountability loop 

3. What does success look like?
You have all heard the adage:

“You fish for a man and he can eat for a day”

Or

“You teach a man to fish and he can eat for a lifetime”.

The sales coach adage is some what different:

“You help a sales rep close a sale and he gets a commission”

Or

“You coach a sales rep to get better at closing and he gets rich”.

Coaching is different then teaching. Coaching is a process of developing individuals and incorporates self-discovery and self-improvement. Success in coaching is about developing your salespeople into top performers.

Success: One Step at a Time:
As a sales manager if you are able to develop just one important skill area from a 2 out of 10 to an 8 out of 10 in one year, I believe you have made that rep a better salesperson. Sometimes we try to do too much and end up having little or no impact. Self-discovery, self-awareness and self-improvement take time. With so much going on the key to coaching salespeople for success is to focus on just one skill/behaviour at a time.

I spend a good portion of my time working with sales managers and sales executives. In conversations with sales managers I will ask them who their bottom two salespeople are.  Then I ask, “What is the one skill/behaviour that will have the greatest impact on his/her success.”

The next set of questions I ask the sales manager is “Who are your top two salespeople” and then “What is the one skill/behaviour that will have the greatest impact on his/her success. “

Working with tenured sales managers who have been coaching the same salespeople for years, I will ask them “What is the skill/behaviour that will have the greatest impact on each of their salespeople.” I will also query to see how long this has been the case. If the same skill/behaviour has not improved over several years the question is, how good is the coach?

The point is, as a sales manager you should be focused on improving the skills/behaviors of all your reps. If you can make your top sales reps better, what happens? If you can improve the performance of your bottom performers, what happens?

 The key in coaching your salespeople to success is developing each of them to be the best they can be!

Steven Rosen, MBA is a sales management expert who helps companies transform sales managers into great sales coaches. Steven’s works with sales executives to; hire top performing sales reps and managers, develop their team into top sales managers and achieve greater personal and professional success.  He is the CEO of STAR Results, author of many articles in the areas of sales management coaching and sales management training. He is a member of Top Sales Experts. Steven’s mission is to inspire sales leaders, managers and sales people to achieve their full potential. He can be reached at steven@starresults.com or 905-737-4548.

April 10, 2009

Guest Article: “How to Coach the Talented-Slacker,” by Steven Rosen

How to Coach the Talented-Slacker
by Steven Rosen

Meet Jane.

Jane is an experienced and successful district sales manager who could work in any industry and for any company. In fact, there are many Jane’s in all companies. Jane is performance-driven, a very good coach and a people person. Each month Jane is put to the test with different sales reps she must coach to success.

Jane’s Profile:

Current:
District Sales Manager IBZ Inc. 2004-

Past:
Sales Manager Alba Inc. 2000-2004
Product Manager Alba Inc 1996-2000
Sales Rep Alba Inc. 1992-1996

Education:
Business Degree 1992

Courses:
Managing Effort Getting Results 2008
Professional Sales Management 2007
Sales Coaching for Success 2006
Professional Selling 1998

IBZ is a mid-sized technology company that has had some tough years but has turned the corner. It pays its reps a combination of salary and bonus for achievement of targets. This year the bonus plans have a super bonus portion which accelerates when a rep is 5% over quota.

Jane wants to get 2009 off to a great start. However, as she shared in one of our monthly coaching sessions, she is frustrated with one of her most tenured sales reps.

For some background, Jane took over an underperforming region last year and has helped lead the team to be in the top 25% of districts in the country. Jane’s goal in 2009 is to reach the top 10% of the country and she is focused. Her key area of focus is on finding innovative ways to grow the business. She wants her team to develop new business opportunities for lagging product lines.

As she reviews her team, the one rep keeps coming up. Ray has been with the company for over 20 years and has worked with 10 DM’s. He has been on 2 personal improvement programs (PIP) and has won several sales contests in the last few years.

Ray knows his stuff, he knows his customers and he knows how to get others in the office to do his work. When Jane works with Ray she has a good day although she wonders whether he works full days when she is not with him. He picks her up at 8:30 and drops her off around 4:30. The day is well planned and Ray has a good rapport with his customers.

Jane has invested a lot of energy trying to motivate Ray and a lot of time giving him positive feedback on his skills, customer service and business plans and on his year-end review. She would like to see the results if he would put the extra call each day.

In reviewing Ray’s 2009 business plan, Jane determine that he had not included any new target customers or innovative approaches to driving the business further. She is frustrated with Ray’s lack of initiative and drive.

Questions:

1. How do you motivate Ray to put in the extra effort required to be a top rep?

2. How much time would you invest in Ray in 2009?

 

Dear Jane,

Ray is an example of a rep that has all the talent but lacks consistent effort to be a top performer. The first thing we need to remember as managers is that it is not our job to motivate our reps. External motivation is short-lived. It is not necessarily sustained when you are not with your rep.

Another way to approach Ray is to encourage him to focus on developing new business. He may think he knows best and he will appease you by picking a few accounts. He knows he will have a new manager in time and will outlast that manager as well. Provide Ray with positive reinforcement only when Ray demonstrates that he is driving new business and initiatives.

You can continue to invest in Ray’s development but will get limited returns for the time you invest. With 8 other reps you can achieve a better ROI by investing in those reps that put out a consistent high level of effort and are self- motivated.

Let me know how it goes,

Steven Rosen

Steven Rosen, MBA is the founder of STAR Results. STAR Results is a sales leadership consulting, training and coaching organization dedicated to leadership development in the Pharmaceutical industry. Steven works with sales executives to; hire top performing sales reps, develop a team of top sales managers and achieve greater personal and professional success. http://www.starresults.com/

April 4, 2009

For Sales Training to Produce Results, Management Must Change Their View of What Training Is

“We just don’t have any funds to bring in trainers this year.  Besides, we just haven’t had that much success with outside trainers anyway.  They come in and do their thing, but after they leave, we’ve never really seen much of an impact in our sales that we think came from them. “

“They come in and do their thing.” 

That’s the crux of the problem with training.  Companies and salespeople see trainers as “doing their thing,” that is, putting on a show and disseminating information, not changing the behavior of salespeople. 

If companies want to see real change in their sales teams, they must rethink what sales training is and how it is delivered.  Training isn’t just information exchange.  If it were, all the company need do is have each salesperson read a book or listen to a CD.  You don’t need to spend a small fortune to bring in the author of the book or CD if all he or she is going to do is give a verbal presentation of the same information contained in the book.  That’s nothing more than hiring a very expensive reader who presents the material in a bit more personal and entertaining format.

Training, at its core, is about changing behavior.  The information necessary to begin the behavior change is certainly critical, but it is nothing more than the beginning of the training process.  The real value of training is learning how to apply the information in the real world, that is, how to turn the information into the behavior that helps one sell. 

The world is full of salespeople who “know” what to do, but have no workable idea of how to do it, who have received the correct information, but haven’t received the necessary coaching to turn it from information into action.

The basic reason sales training has not had the impact companies, salespeople, and trainers have hoped for is the failure to address the long-term coaching necessary to have individual salespeople’s behavior change.

Sales training results will continue to be less than satisfactory unless the group training session is followed up with consistent, disciplined coaching.  And the coaching must be more than simply monitoring behavior and results with the subsequent admonitions or pats on the back.  It must consist of analysis, guidance, and individualized training.  Whether the follow-up coaching is done by the original trainer, the salesperson’s manager, or someone from an in-house training department, the coach must be thoroughly immersed in the what, how, and why of the behaviors to be achieved, and how to help the salesperson acquire and implement those behaviors.   

If you intend to hire a trainer and have them “come in and do their thing” and leave, save your money because you and your team will be disappointed. 

If you want to see real change within your team-and to your bottom-line–change your view of training from a session to a long-term process of changing behavior.  Yes, it will certainly cost more up front.  It won’t produce the overnight change many sales trainers have led companies to expect in the past-and that never materialized.  But it will produce the results you want and instead of wasting the money you’ve wasted on training in the past, your money will be invested in your company’s success, not spent on the trainer’s success.

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,442 other followers