Sales and Sales Management Blog

August 21, 2008

Social Media–It Ain’t All Good

At times the praise of social media would make one think it equivalent to the Second Coming.  Although there are certainly many good things about the uses and potential uses of the various technology now available to businesspeople and businesses, I find that there is an element to social media that lends itself not to enhancing business and one’s ability to interact with others, but rather to coarsening business, leading users to communicate in ways that they would probably never–or maybe more correctly would never have done previous to social media–do in a traditional one-on-one format.

Although allowed in a number of places, the use of screen names instead of one’s name is most prevalent in community forums and allows people to comment without disclosing their real identity.  Inevitably, this ability to say what one wants without having to be responsible for the comment has lead to the breakdown in many cases of social norms and a very real coarsening of communication.

Up until recently, most of the coarsening of communication that I’ve noticed via the Internet has been somewhat limited-primarily to discussions of politics, religion, and other very personal areas.  That seems to be changing.

I’m beginning to see more and more personal attacks, vulgar language, and even veiled threats in business forums.  To date this coarsening in business communication seems to be relatively rare-but growing.  Even the Sales Sandbox on The Customer Collective in their tag line of “Learn*Share*Create*Play Nice” felt a need to ask users to be civil in their comments.

I suspect as more people encounter these instances of the breach of acceptable communication the practice will broaden and become more acceptable.  But as it becomes more acceptable on the net will that bleed over into our daily communication with one another?  To some extent it seems to have done so within other areas of discussion.

The available anonymity of social media is one of the major drawbacks of the technology.  If we could only eliminate screen names and communicate with one another once again as real humans!

June 16, 2008

Avoiding Uncomfortable Discussions with Your Prospects and Clients Isn’t Going to Build Trust

Are you blind to the political issues and candidates that impact your family, your sales business, and your clients? Even if political, economic, social, and cultural issues aren’t high on your radar, are you going to simply avoid the subject during this election season? Could you if you wanted to? Few of us, no matter how well or ill informed we may be, can honestly say that we have no opinions regarding the candidates and the issues.

As salespeople we spend a fair amount of time trying to develop relationships built upon trust, honesty, and openness with our prospects and clients. We claim that we want to build relationships with our clients, we want to get to know them as people and not just as potential purchasers, we want to create friends, not just accounts. Many of us go to great lengths to learn how to read body language, to communicate in a manner that caters to the prospect’s personality type, to read the unspoken signals the client sends through how they dress, how they decorate their office, what they drive, and what they do for recreation and relaxation. Our goal we say is to treat the prospect as a whole person.

Nevertheless, our holistic approach to sales is one sided. For many of us, there are areas of discussion and interaction that we want to hide from our prospect. Let the conversation get close to the area of political or social opinion and all the sudden many of us no longer are too anxious to build the relationship on honesty and openness. Instead of openness, we seek to avoid; instead of honesty, we seek to muddy the waters to the point our client has no idea where we stand.

Many of us will spend the next few months doing a delicate dance of avoidance, trying to offend no one while insisting that we are open, honest, trustworthy individuals, intent only on meeting the prospect’s needs and becoming trusted advisors. We’ll try to build relationships based on getting to know our client while allowing them to get to know only three quarters of us. We’ll try to balance on the head of pin, afraid that if we reveal ourselves as a political or socially aware person we’ll offend, we’ll step on toes, we’ll lose a sale.

In my opinion–and experience–not only is this behavior ingenuous, but it is itself destructive. Prospects and clients expect each of us to have opinions and they are quite aware that those opinions may be counter to their own.

What are we communicating to prospects and clients when we try to sidestep discussion of the issues or candidates? Many immediately assume we’re avoiding the issue because we hold opinions we believe are counter to theirs—so whether their assumption is correct or not, by avoiding the discussion we risk offending the prospect by unintentionally communicating a contrary opinion to theirs. A few may assume that we’re not informed well enough or care enough to have an opinion. Most will assume that we’re simply trying to play the game, trying to be ‘real’ as long as that reality doesn’t involve anything of substance in our personal lives.

Conventional wisdom has been to avoid political discussion. Conventional wisdom comes from a time when the emphasis wasn’t on building long-term, trust based relationships with prospects and clients.

I’m not advocating you initiate political and social discussion, but avoiding it isn’t going to advance the relationship either.

Seldom have I found discussing these issues to be, well, an issue. I have lost a few sales that I can trace to these types of discussions, but I can identify many more sales I’ve made where the sale had its roots in a willingness to engage in political and social discussions.

As long as you are respectful of the prospect’s point of view, have reasoned arguments for your stance, and don’t engage in inflammatory language, there is no reason to fear alienating a prospect or client. In fact, if you can intelligently discuss the issues in light of how they may impact your prospect’s business, you may find that your discussion instead of being a potential minefield may be one of the most compelling reasons to do business with you. Prospects and clients not only respect honesty, they also respect salespeople who understand their business and the future prospects for their business. By demonstrating an understanding of how political, economic and social issues may affect your prospect’s future, you demonstrate an intimate knowledge of their business—and prospects love to do business with people they trust and who really understand their problems, issues, and opportunities.

February 21, 2008

Guest Article: “From Ethics to Integrity: How to Make Doing What’s Right a Way of Life,” by Randy Pennington

From Ethics To Integrity: How To Make Doing What’s Right A Way Of Life
by Randy G. Pennington

In the best of all worlds, ethical behavior would be the expected way of doing business. Employees at all levels would make decisions based on the personal commitment to honesty, integrity and fairness. They would carry out their duties, promote the organization’s ideals and maintain the trust of their customers, suppliers, co-workers and communities. In this perfect world, no one would succumb to temptation and the lure of expedience. Unfortunately, there is no perfect world.

We live in a world where trust has deteriorated into widespread cynicism. The increased demands of a highly competitive market have forced us to consider short cuts once dismissed as unthinkable. Scandals and improprieties (real or imagined) reinforce the belief that playing by the Golden Rule is now passé. Bed fellows abound at a time when true partnerships are needed to meet the challenges of building strong relationships.

Written Codes Are Not Enough
Written ethics codes and value statements are the traditional response to the challenge of unifying the organization’s beliefs and behavior. They are intended to provide direction and ensure consistency of expectation and performance. They have worked in many cases. In others, written ethics codes have been routinely ignored while behavior that is, at best, questionable becomes the order of the day. Written codes and value statements are necessary, but they do not ensure integrity in word and deed. They are merely the first step in a long and difficult process that moves the organization from ethics compliance toward a commitment to integrity in products, services and relationships. Only then will the inspiring values statements that hang on the wall be transformed into performance that promotes trust, mutual respect and commitment to doing what is right. Behavior that destroys organizational integrity is more likely to occur when these five factors have greater impact than written codes and value statements:

The culture makes it okay.
Adlai Stevenson said, “Laws are never as effective as habits.” Most people know, for example, that the law dictates the speed limit. Yet, many routinely exceed it based on habit. An organization’s culture is demonstrated by its habits. Overlooking or even rewarding questionable behavior sends the message that it is condoned or even encouraged. A study done by John Delaney and Donna Sockell at Columbia University reported that 40 percent of respondents who chose to act unethically were rewarded, either explicitly or implicitly. Determine the habits that send messages about the importance of rules and standards and you will discover the aspects of the organization’s culture that influence integrity.

Systems reinforce behavior.
Systems are the tools to promote efficiency and consistency. They are powerful vehicles for developing habits though repetitious performance. Effectively designed systems in areas such as compensation, performance management and purchasing are important components of an environment that has grown beyond compliance to ethics and embraced integrity as a way of life. Otherwise, systems can unconsciously promote behavior that contradicts the organization’s good intentions.

Pressure to achieve results with limited resources.
It is a challenge to maintain or increase productivity levels in times of decreasing resources. Leaders may be tempted to say “Get it done any way you can.” There is, however, an inherent danger in this message. Employees respond by cutting corners, and potentially open the door to actions that destroy trust and credibility. Directives must communicate the expectation of results and responsibility for how they are achieved.

People blindly follow the directions and example of others.
There are two situations where this could occur. The first is when an inspiring, charismatic leader persuades others to follow his/her direction regardless of the consequences. There are numerous examples of well meaning individuals whose judgment was clouded by the ability of a great motivator.

The second is when employees assume that the directives they receive from management should be followed without question. The assumption is that all decisions have been examined before they are implemented. The solution to blind compliance in both scenarios is educated employees that understand the organization’s mission and values, think for themselves and are willing to ask questions when they arise.

The lure of expedience.
Ben Franklin wrote that success is primarily a function of what you are and that one must master 13 internal principles to be achieve it. External trappings were the result rather than a primary indicator. That view has changed.

Our culture sends powerful messages that say success is based on what you have. The ends justify the means. The desire to have it all today can lead to short-term thinking, rationalizing actions and cutting corners.

Making the move from ethics to integrity.
Kathleen Purdy, writing in the June 1994 edition of “Ethical Management,” says, “What started out in many organizations as mere (ethics) compliance is now a very powerful process. One that weaves together many other programs aimed at change.” Leaders are discovering that successful products, services and relationships are all connected by a common thread — integrity. It goes beyond ethics, Total Quality Management, customer service and empowerment to build trust and commitment among customers, employees, suppliers and the community. The following ideas will help your organization make the transition:

Begin where your influence is highest.
Dr. Stanley Pearle, founder of Pearle Vision, is fond of saying, “The customer is smarter than you think. You must deliver what you promise. That is the only way to develop trust.” Lasting change is an inside out process. Individuals must change before organizations can change. A foundation of trust, mutual respect and commitment must exist internally with employees and suppliers before moving externally to customers and communities.

State expectations, but avoid a new “Integrity Program.”
The goal is to make integrity the guiding principle for products, services and relationships. New programs become the latest example of MBBS­p;Management By Best Seller. Instead state your expectations in an open, honest manner so that everyone understands their obligation to customers, suppliers, communities and each other. Explain that strategic initiatives such as TQM, empowerment, self-managed teams, new performance management practices and ethics codes are simply the tools to help the organization meet those obligations. Avoid any hype, admit you are constantly working to fine-tune your own performance and ask everyone to join you in the goal of making integrity the number one operating principle. Continuously remind everyone that the ultimate goal is on-going trust, loyalty and commitment of customers, employees, suppliers and communities in a way that insures everyone’s long-term viability and survival.

Design systems and structures that promote integrity, trust, mutual respect and commitment.
Systems and structures create habits in organizations. Each system should be judged by the following three criteria: Are we doing what we said we would do? Are we providing what we said we would provide? Does the system reinforce our commitment to integrity, trust, mutual respect and commitment? Organizational systems, both internal and external, send a message about our integrity that is more powerful than any ethics code or values statement.

Hold people accountable for achieving results in ways that promote integrity of products, services and relationships.
Leaders must reinforce that there is no “either/or” alternative. Results must be achieved through actions that demonstrate integrity in products, services and relationships. This message is sent through promotions, compensation, perks and the handling of performance that does not meet their expectations.

Educate to provide knowledge and skills then empower people to act.
The goal of ethics codes is often compliance with stated requirements. Focusing on integrity can empower every individual to recognize, confront and correct performance that diminishes trust in products, services and relationships. Individuals and teams should spend time discussing and understanding the impact of decisions and actions to acquire the knowledge to improve in the future. Skill building provides the tools that enable them to respond effectively when situations arise.

The number one characteristic people want from their leaders is integrity. We tend to trust leaders who walk their talk on a personal level. It is a crucial ingredient, but it is only the first step in a long process. Ultimately, leaders must become passionate in their zeal to move toward a better world that expects, encourages and promotes integrity in products, services and relationships.

Randy Pennington is a business performance veteran, author, and an expert in helping organizations build a culture focused on results.  Randy focuses on what works in your world – the real world – and he does it in a style that relates to people at every level of every organization.  Randy is the author of Results Rule: Build a Culture that Blows the Competition Away and On My Honor: Leading with Integrity in Changing Times.  Learn more about Randy at www.penningtongroup.com

—————————————————————————————————————————

On another note, I’d like to point out an interesting post this morning at Job Profiles listing the top 100 sources to find the best talent in numerous industries.  If you’re looking to hire top talent–or if you’re looking for a new opportunity, you’re likely to find some sites you’re not familiar with.

December 29, 2007

An Example of One of Our Illustrious Public School Educators at Work

Filed under: Culture — Paul McCord @ 12:49 pm
Tags: , ,

Seldom do I engage in political or even social criticism.  Yet, I ran across a blog post this morning that simply begs for attention.  Written by a gentleman named Malcolm Martin–described as a teacher and elected member of a chapter of the American Federation of Teachers.  The title of his post pretty much says it all: “Socialism Is The Only Way.”  It is an argument that Marxism and the defeat of capitalism is the only salvation for humankind.

Many lament the sad condition of our public schools.  Mr. Martin is that sad state personified.  More than a teacher, more than an elected member of a teacher’s union, he describes himself as a “warrior” for socialism and the death of the American system.  God save our children from our educational system.

The post itself would be humorous if it weren’t for the fact that it is written by one who is charged with the task of educating our kids.  And should we expect a reasonable, logical, balanced presentation of facts and ideas from one who describes himself as a “warrior” for socialism?  Warriors don’t teach–they proselytize, they seek converts—and destroy those who don’t convert. 

Here is the link to his article at the Dissident Voice: a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/12/socialism-is-the-only-way/

Blog at WordPress.com.