Sales and Sales Management Blog

November 4, 2008

Sell a Service? Now’s the Time to Shine

Filed under: Economy, marketing, sales, selling — Paul McCord @ 9:32 am
Tags: , , ,

Home sales-down.  Auto sales-down.  Travel for pleasure-down.  With the economy in its current mess, people aren’t spending on big-ticket items, at least not in the numbers of the past several years.  And it isn’t just consumers who are holding onto their dollars, businesses are also.   That means fewer copiers, high dollar software programs, plant and equipment expansions and acquisitions, and other significant outlays are being put on the back burner.

For Realtors, auto dealers, travel agents, and manufacturers, that’s bad news.  But bad news for one group is always good news for another.

If you’re in a service related business, your time has come. 

Car and truck sales down?  That means more business for repair and body shops. 

Fewer homes being sold?  More business for remodelers, painters, and fix-it companies.

Companies not investing in copiers?  More need for fast copy companies and copier repair companies. 

Even companies whose sales of new products are down can take advantage of the current economy.

Car dealerships can increase the promotion of their service, parts, and body shop divisions.

Software resellers can increase their training and support billing as more and more companies retain and upgrade their current systems instead of installing new systems.

HVAC companies can promote their repair services to help homeowners get another year out of their heating systems. 

The temptation in today’s economy is to pull back on marketing and promotion.  Cutting costs is paramount-but not at the expense of gaining new business. 

Instead of cutting your marketing expenditures, redirect your marketing to take advantage of the new market reality-people and companies will make due with what they have instead of purchasing new.  But when they decide to make due, they spend money on repairs and upgrades they wouldn’t have thought of investing in previously.  They don’t stop spending money on their car, home, or business, they just spend differently.

October 23, 2008

Guest Article: “Maximizing Your Price in a Soft Economy,” by Mark Hunter

Maximizing Your Price in a Soft Economy
By Mark Hunter

Establishing maximum value for your price is never easy.  In today’s volatile economy, it’s even more of a challenge.  For most companies, costs are increasing, yet the ability to pass them along to the customer is fraught with numerous roadblocks.  The customer’s response to a price increase is rarely positive, with the usual line of objections that go along with it.  In addition, there are the concerns that a competitor’s price may undercut yours or that the customer may choose to go down a different path instead of buying from you at all.  As big as these issues are, they pale in comparison to the number one roadblock to maximizing your price point:  the confidence of the salesperson.

The main reason why companies do not capitalize on their potential revenue is because their salespeople do not have the confidence to ask for and receive the highest price point.  If a salesperson is secure in what they are selling and in knowing how the customer will benefit from their products/services, then they will be confident in asking for and getting the desired price point.  The problem is that many times the salesperson lacks confidence in at least one of these areas, resulting in their inability to make their sales quota.

To rectify this problem, it’s important to examine how the salesperson first developed a lack of confidence in their ability to maximize their price points.  Generally, it stems from a sale they perceived to be lost because their price had been too high.  On the surface, their assumption probably appeared to be correct.  However, in reality, it just seemed that way because the right price-value relationship had not been established.   If the salesperson had executed a proper sales strategy that allowed both himself and the customer to see the product’s/service’s true value, this could have been avoided.  It needs to be communicated that in a B to B environment, the benefits are to both the buyer and the business they’re buying it for.  In a B to C environment, the benefits are to both the buyer and to the person(s) who will actually use the product or service.  When the salesperson and the customer understand this, it can help erase the uncertainty that the price may pose.

Let me give you two quick examples.  If a person works for a mega-global company and is buying widgets, he’d have no problem spending a little on them if he knew he was buying them from a reputable company that has experience selling to other mega-global companies.  In essence, the customer is looking for confidence and is willing to pay for it.  In a B to C situation, because the customer doesn’t want to look like a fool for their purchase, they want the salesperson to provide them with enough emotional benefit to allow them to convey to others that they made a great decision.  In both situations, an inexperienced salesperson is going to lose the sale if they don’t take the time to use questions that encourage the customer to fully express their needs.  In general, new salespeople often lose the sale shortly after they’ve stated their price.  Thus, it’s only natural for them to believe that the price was the determining factor.  However, when digging below the surface, the price was not what prevented them from closing the deal.  Rather, they lost the sale because they didn’t ask enough questions to fully establish the needs of the customer.

Top-performing salespeople ask questions that allow the customer to elaborate on their needs and then demonstrate their listening skills by asking appropriate open questions and probing deeper with great follow-up questions.  They use the information that they learn to better explain how their product or service can be beneficial to the customer.  In my 25 plus years of selling, I’ve learned that the customer’s real needs, hurts, and wants don’t often surface until you’re demonstrated genuine interest in what their thoughts and goals are.  Ironically, this means that you can throw out their initial comments, as it is rarely the need they are looking to fill.  If you expect to base your price-value relationship on what you first hear, you’ll never come close to achieving your maximum price point. 

In summary, today’s economy is full of opportunities for top performing salespeople to ask really good questions that get customers talking.  This allows both the customer and the salesperson to see, feel, and understand what their true needs are.  When the salesperson can experience this across multiple customers, they will begin to develop the assurance they need to be able to confidently convey the maximum price point their company expects them to receive.

 

Mark Hunter, “The Sales Hunter”, is a sales expert who speaks to thousands each year on how to increase their sales profitability.  For more information, to receive a free weekly email sales tip or to read his Sales Motivation Blog, visit www.TheSalesHunter.com.

October 13, 2008

Attitude, Expectations, and Reality

“I have to work harder than before, but even so, my sales this month will be better than last October’s.”

“My prospects and clients are certainly feeling the pinch of the economy and they’re fearful.  But I also closed the biggest sale of my career last week.”

“Despite the news and the hype of the last two or three weeks, I’ve only seen a slight decrease in our sales.  Our salespeople have to be much more selective in qualifying prospects and they have to spend more time building value into the sale, but our customers are still buying, they’re still getting the financing they need, and their companies are still profitable.  It’s tough, but not nearly as bad as what you’d believe if you just listened to the news.”

“Seems like everybody wants to just sit and wait it out and see what happens.  Everyone is afraid.  No one knows what to do at this point, so our sales have fallen off the chart the past couple of weeks.  I really don’t want our GM to talk to the salespeople because there’s a sound of panic in his voice.”

“I’m finding it more difficult every day to make sales calls.  No one wants to make a decision and even some who would be willing to go forward aren’t sure they can get the funds to do so.”

“I’m working hard.  I’m willing to talk to people I would have passed over just a couple of months ago.  I’m spending a lot of time talking but I’m not getting anywhere.  I’ve even found myself reverting back to doing some pretty hard sell stuff trying to get something going.”

The above are comments about selling during the last two weeks from several of my clients from various parts of the country, each in a different industry.

Like many others, I’ve spoken to many salespeople and managers over the past couple of weeks who blame the economy on poor sales.  Their words indicate they are struggling, their voice indicates defeat. When we talk about strategies to overcome sales resistance and to find and connect with quality prospects, they complain that I’m not being realistic, that I just don’t understand their situation, that in their industry in today’s economy it isn’t rational to expect to maintain their sales volume or their pricing structure.

Yet I have other clients in the same industries as those who claim it unrealistic to expect to maintain their sales volumes, who are still selling at or near their previous levels-one who signed the biggest contract of her career just last week.

Which ‘reality’ is reality? Is it the reality of those whose voice communicates defeat and hopelessness–or is reality really reflected by those who although they say the market is tough are producing at or near their pre-crisis levels?

I believe that both realities are, in fact, reality.  More correctly, I believe that the ‘reality’ of defeat and hopeless is a self-fulfilling prophesy, whereas the ‘reality’ of “it’s tough but the sales are still there” reflects the actual marketplace.

Let me explain why I believe that.

When we begin discussing the specifics of their activity, those who foresee doom and gloom and whose sales have plummeted, have:

  • Spent less time prospecting than they did prior to the economic ‘crisis’
  • They are less selective in whom they speak with, hoping against hope to find someone interested
  • Their conversations are more hard sell than they had been previous to acquiring their current attitude of desperation and depression
  • They expect the prospect to refuse to make a decision at this time

Not surprisingly, they get exactly what they expect.  By making fewer contacts with less qualified prospects and then trying to strong arm a sale, they are seeing their sales fall drastically.  They are getting the exact results they not only expect but have set themselves up to get.

On the other hand, when I speak to those who are doing well in this market I find that they:

  • Have increased their prospecting activity
  • Are more selective in qualifying their prospects
  • Are spending more time working with prospects to understand their needs and issues to build more value into the sale than they had previously
  • Are taking additional time and care to build relationships prior to seeking to sign a contract
  • Understand that although the market is more difficult, there are still more quality prospects in the market than they can take care of-their job is to find them

Yes, these men and women are working longer and harder than they have in quite some time.  But they aren’t seeing the drastic decrease in business many others are.  And, yes, they expect to be successful.  But that expectation is balanced with a serious dose of reality that says they must work both harder and smarter-they must invest more time and effort and be much more selective in how and where they spend their time.

The current paralysis that a great many are seeing in the marketplace is only two or three weeks old.  It is very likely-a foregone conclusion-that the market will get tighter before it begins to get better.  But for a few, the current market driven by fear-for both prospects and clients-isn’t hindering their production.  Not because they’re lucky or because they have some magic formula, but because they haven’t allowed the ‘reality’ of the ‘crisis’ to stop them from selling.

They have to spend more time prospecting.  They have to work harder.  They are having to develop new skills and new strategies.  But they aren’t letting the perceived ‘reality’ of the negative and hopeless create their reality.

You need not accept the defeatist ‘reality’ either. You will have to invest more time and be more selective in finding and connecting with quality prospects-but they are out there.  You will have to invest more time in building solid relationships and building more value into each sale.  You may well have to invest in training and coaching to learn more effective prospecting and sales methods and strategies.  It isn’t easy and it takes commitment, innovation, and perseverance-but it works.  Just ask those who are finding the current market to be just as lucrative as the market was before the ‘crisis.’

September 26, 2008

Bailout, It’s Just a 7 Letter Word–Or Is It?

Filed under: Communication, Economy, business, marketing, sales, selling — Paul McCord @ 7:25 am
Tags: , , , ,

Your daughter has grossly overextended herself.  Her credit cards, mortgage and car payments alone are three times her monthly take home pay.  Up until now she’s been able to rob from one to cover the other, but it’s now caught up with her.  She comes to you to confess her excesses and ask for help.

As a parent, you have options.  You can, of course, send her on her way to suffer the consequences of her behavior and out of control spending, knowing it will take years of work and self-denial for her to right herself.

You could just take out your checkbook and start writing checks-her bailout, if you will, knowing the likelihood of ever getting repaid is virtually zero.

Another alternative would be to work with her and her creditors to see if you could negotiate either reduced payments which you will make or a greatly reduced payoff-which you will immediately write a check to the creditor for, again expecting little or no repayment from your daughter, but at least giving her the opportunity to start over.

But you also have another alternative.  You could go to her creditors and let them know that you’re going to stand behind your daughter, but you’re not going to pay off her debts.  Instead, she’ll take her monthly income and make every payment she can and you’ll step in and make those payments she can’t.  You’ll only take up the slack in her cash flow and for only as long as necessary.  She’ll still be on a beans and cornbread diet for years, but her creditors will be paid, her credit history will be intact.

As her parent, which would you choose?

Now, turn it around.  You are no longer her parent; you’re one of the credit card companies who extended her credit.  Which option do you prefer?  I’d assume you’d like to see her parent take option number two-just pay the debt off.  You know you have a debtor who is going to default if something isn’t done.  You don’t want to negotiate a payoff unless you absolutely must because that is going to cost you money.  Even though her parent has promised to underwrite her payments, they have no legal obligation-they could change their mind.  Besides, since you have a great many other credit card holders in the same situation, you really want your money now, not later.

Although simplistic, these are the basic options congress is debating to ‘resolve’ the financial markets mess.  Do we simply take the bad debt, do we try to negotiate it down to the bare bones, or do we underwrite it?  I certainly recognize there’s more to it than this, and not being an economist, I’m not trying to argue for one or the other, or to explain the intricacies of the options.  But the language used to present the plans holds an important lesson for us in sales.

Certainly, Wall Street has made their preference known-take the bad debt.  Buy their paper at as close to face value as possible, saving their balance sheet, allowing them to go back, in essence, to business as usual.

That, of course, isn’t going to happen.  The Paulson/Bernanke proposal is akin to the third choice, negotiating a greatly reduced payoff-with a twist.  As a parent, you would want to negotiate the lowest possible payoff of your daughter’s debt.  You’d want to get out as cheaply as possible.  The twist in the Treasury plan is to hold a ‘discovery auction’ to determine the current fair market value of those debts.  That is the price at which they would be bought-maybe higher, maybe lower than the lowest possible negotiated payoff.  And unlike you when you payoff your daughter’s debt, the Treasury has an asset they would hope to be able to sell at some point in the future and get at least some of the money back.

The Paulson/Bernanke proposal isn’t a straight bailout, although unfortunately for them, it has been presented in the news that way and the major spokesperson for the plan, Paulson, has even used that term on occasion in the past.  Furthermore, the plan’s goal isn’t to save Wall Street companies but to free up the credit markets-to make it possible and attractive for companies to lend money to both business and consumer.  Without access to credit, the rest of the economy will collapse.

Because of how the plan has been reported in the news media, many people view the plan as simply paying off the daughter’s debt, making the creditor whole while draining the parent’s (taxpayers) bank account.  That’s a misperception based on the language used-and used by some of those involved in constructing and presenting the plan.

Bailout.  It’s just a small 7 letter word, one that everyone knows the meaning of.  Synonyms are ‘help,’ ‘escape,’ and ‘rescue.’   Many people are thinking in terms of ‘escape,’ as in Wall Street companies escaping the consequences of their bad investments and those coming to the ‘rescue’ having to payoff that bad debt in return for—-nothing.

Words are more than simply a collection of letters.  They have both positive and negative meanings-and positive and negative connotations.  Bailout, at least in this context, has the most negative meaning and connotation possible for many taxpayers.  Paulson and others have allowed the term to become attached to the plan, even on occasion using the term themselves, thus positioning the plan in the worst possible light.

As salespeople and marketers, we should take careful note of how just one little 7 letter word can completely change the perception of our presentation.

September 24, 2008

Now Is The Time to Suit Up for Battle


I’ve received several emails and phone calls from clients wanting to know what they should be doing right now.  Should they be battening down the hatches?  Shrinking their sales teams?  Waiting to see what happens in Washington this week?  Heading for the mountains with food rations and ammo?  Others indicate they feel too depressed and fearful to get out of the office and into the field-what good will it do anyway?

As Wall Street smolders, Congress grandstands, and the business community frets, our lives continue.

Are you spending more time checking the news and than finding prospects?  Are you more worried about the economy than your pipeline?  Are you frozen in place, mesmerized by the teetering financial markets?

The spectacle in Washington and New York is important.  What’s going on is going to impact all of us-and we probably aren’t going to like the impact one way or another.  However, no matter our view of the proceedings, we have to continue to sell, to find prospects, to put food on the table.

We must maintain our focus.

When it’s all said and done, we’ll still be doing what we’re doing today-although, admittedly, it may be harder.

Although the future is murky, the present isn’t-our job is still intact, our responsibility today is the same as it was days, weeks, or months ago.  We still get paid the same way.

More importantly, there are still prospects out there.  There are still individuals and companies making money, needing products and services.

There are still prospects out there working hard to grow their families and grow their businesses.

We must do the same.

Put aside the newspaper.

Turn off the tv and radio.

Forget the Internet news sites.

Ignore the hysteria.

I don’t mean forget the issues or stick you head in the sand.  Certainly there are fears of recession-maybe even worse.  But when the work day starts, we have to get to work.

We have to concentrate on our business and let the rest go.  We must focus our efforts on our prospects, our clients, our sales.

If the world comes to an end during the workday, we’ll find out soon enough.

For many of us, this will take a great deal of discipline and self-control.  Certainly we’re all concerned about the economy, our jobs, and our families.  Even though the future may be murky, we know what we must do today.

For those of us who have lived through the turmoil of the economic crisis of the 70’s and the Savings and Loan debacle of the 80’s, we have some history to help bolster us.  For those that didn’t, take some solace in history-this isn’t the first crisis-and it won’t be the last, since we never seem to learn.

Set your focus on developing and expanding your sales business.  Take heart in knowing there is a very good possibility your competitors will be sitting at their desks fretting over the economy, watching every twist and turn of the proceeding in Washington, skipping a heartbeat with the slightest up or down of the big board.  Take advantage of an opportunity to act while your competitor is stagnant.

The more you allow yourself to wallow in fear and become sluggish with worry, the harder it is going to be to break out and get back to business.

Now is not the time to lose your focus.  Now isn’t the time to wallow in self-pity or to succumb to fear.  Now is the time to suit up for battle, to hit the streets harder than ever,  to take advantage of your competitor’s lose of focus.

July 7, 2008

Selling In a Weak Economy

Filed under: Economy, business, marketing, prospecting, sales, selling, small business — Paul McCord @ 9:45 am
Tags: , , ,

Pick up any newspaper and you’ll find stories about how bad the economy is.  Foreclosures are snowballing, the unemployment rate is inching up, gas prices are soaring, there are fears of runaway inflation, food prices are way up, layoffs are increasing, the stock market is down, the world as we know it is coming to an end.

For salespeople, this onslaught of bad economic news can have devastating psychological consequences.  It erodes our confidence, heightens our anxiety, and may even convince us that our efforts are hopeless.  The normal ‘no’ we receive is no longer simply no, instead it’s a sign of how bad the economy is.  Rejection becomes magnified, lost sales are indications of how business has changed and our success or failure is no longer within our control.  As the negative economic news increases, we become more convinced that it isn’t us; it’s the economy that is causing our sales to decline, our income to shrivel, our future to be in question.

Having been through several economic ups and downs in my career, I’ve had the opportunity to experience first hand the insidious nature of paying too close attention to the news.  When we are bombarded by negative reports we tend to absorb those reports into our selling activities.  The negative news we read becomes the negative outcome we expect-and the negative outcome we experience.  We view our successes as the rare exception and our failures as the new norm.

This creeping negativism worms its way into all of our sales business.  Our prospecting decreases-what’s the use anyway?  Our presentations and proposals become defensive, pricing becomes our centerpiece, and we no longer ask for the prospect’s business but instead beg for it.

Yet, there are companies and salespeople who thrive in weak economies.  There are those who view a weak economy as an opportunity to grow their business while their competitors are hunkering down with a bunker mentality, hoping merely to survive.

How can you turn a weak economy to your advantage?

5 “Musts” to maintain momentum during a weak econom

1. Maintain Perspective: Don’t allow yourself to get sucked in by the negative hype about the economy.  Even during the worst of the Great Depression there were people and companies buying all types of products and services.  There are ALWAYS quality prospects that want and need your products and services.  Your job is to find them and connect with them in a manner they will respond to.

2.  Maintain Prospecting: Most salespeople will DECREASE their prospecting as the economy weakens.  Their general feeling of malaise and helplessness can work to your advantage if you can maintain-or even increase-your own level of activity.  Further, since most salespeople will be using the most ineffective prospecting methods such as cold calling and networking, employing prospecting methods that are more acceptable to prospects will give you the opportunity to set yourself apart from the crowd.

3.  Focus on Solving Issues, Not Price: Most of your competition will be focusing on price, not solving real issues and problems.  Although price may be a consideration, quality prospects are more concerned about resolving their issues and problems and value, not getting the lowest possible price.  Focus on the prospect’s needs, not your competitor’s price.  While your competitor is busy turning their products and services into commodities to be sold at the lowest possible price, concentrate on understanding the root issues your prospect has and develop solutions that create value for your prospect.

4.  Relationships Are Key: Human nature doesn’t change just because the economy changes.  Both business and individual consumers buy from people they trust and respect.  Certainly, we all on occasion make purchases from people we don’t have a relationship with-we may even make an occasional purchase from someone we don’t respect or trust, but most sales are created through relationships, not price, hype, or fast talking.  That doesn’t change during a slow economy.  People still purchase from people they trust and respect.  While your competitors are looking for the quick sale, continue developing long-term relationships-not only will it pay off in the long run, it will create immediate selling opportunities also.

5.  Take Advantage: As your competitors become more concerned about the economy, they will begin to batten down the hatches, cutting costs-including their marketing and prospecting expenses.  They may cut other corners, even sacrificing customer service to save a couple of dollars here and there.  Take advantage of the opportunities your competitors open up for you.  Cut out the fat in your business while increasing your marketing and prospecting; make a conscious effort to target your competitor’s best customers; while your competitors retreat to their bunker, become more aggressive in pursuing new business opportunities.

An economic downturn can be a time for you to expand and grow your sales business by doing the opposite of your competition.  While they are cutting marketing and prospecting expenses, allowing themselves to become incapacitated by the bad economic news, and hunkering down hoping to just make it through the bad times, you can turn the economy in your favor by eliminating your unnecessary expenses while expanding your marketing and prospecting, recognizing prospects still buy solutions and buy based on relationships, not just price, and by taking advantage of your competitor’s complacency, fear, and mistakes.

June 23, 2008

Guest Article: “Three Tradeshow Benefits to Embrace Rising Gas Prices,” by Susan Friedmann

Three Tradeshow Benefits to Embrace Rising Gas Prices
By Susan Friedmann

It’s no surprise that oil price are rising through the roof, bringing the cost of gasoline and aviation fuel along for the ride. This morning’s newspapers report that $7 a gallon gasoline might be on the horizon - a staggering number that has dire implications for almost every industry, from travel to agriculture, biotech to capital equipment.

What, you may be wondering, does this have to do with tradeshows?

Let’s not mince words. This situation creates a double-whammy for exhibitors. Not only will it cost more money to transport you, your team, and your exhibit to and from the show, but there will be fewer attendees at the show.

Some organizations, considering this, might make the decision to forgo the show. Higher costs, fewer attendees — it seems like an easy decision to make.

Easy, but wrong. Here’s the top three reasons this is NOT the time to skip the show:

1. Less Competition
There’s no doubt about it: some companies ARE going to skip the show. There will be fewer exhibitors, which means your exhibit will be more visible by default. Savvy exhibitors will have a plan to capitalize on this opportunity.

2. More Time
The less exhibitors attendees have to see, the more time they have to spend with each exhibitor who is there. This gives you a great window to begin or reinforce that relationship. Having a few extra minutes can make all the difference in the world.

3. Better Prospects
With the costs of attending the show rising, weaker prospects — the group that comes to kick tires, take up your time, collect premium items and never buy anything — are less likely to attend. A greater percentage of show attendees will be focused on doing business.

Susan Friedmann is a “how to” coach specializing in the tradeshow industry.  She works with organizations who want to boost their exhibiting results by attracting new business at tradeshows; designs and implements strategies for show organizers and exhibitors who want to retain and grow their customer base; and also works one-on-one with exhibit managers and conducts national and international presentations and workshops.  Her website is www.thetradeshowcoach.com.

June 19, 2008

The Chavezization of Business

American politicians, like politicians around the world, have always used current events as leverage to try to gain power. In our two party system, each party has sought to blame the other side for anything and everything they possibly could that they thought would anger the electorate. Honesty, integrity, and truthfulness have never been at the forefront of these blame game battles.

Nevertheless, most of us have assumed that the ultimate goal was more than just power. We assumed that each party sought power for the sake of moving the country in the direction the party believed was best for the country. We assumed that each party, whether we agreed with them or not, was seeking ways to make the country stronger, to enhance the lives of the country’s citizens, to advance each citizen’s ability to succeed and prosper.

Although we knew that the parties would distort, twist and outright lie to smear the other party in order to gain advantage, we assumed that even during election cycles the parties would not actively work against the citizenry.

It looks like those naive days are gone. We are now facing an election cycle where the higher the Democrat Party can force energy prices, the more pain they can inflict on the country, the more people they can nudge toward impoverishment, the better for them.

The Democrat Party has determined that driving more and more middle-class families toward poverty is in their best interests and has decided to seek to drive petroleum and natural gas prices as high as they possibly can in the interests of ‘conservation’ and to force the development of alternative energy sources. Advocating the failed policies of the past such as the disastrous windfall profits tax of the Carter years, preventing the development of clean coal, nuclear energy, or further exploration and drilling, and preventing the building of new refineries guarantees energy prices will continue to rise and our continued and expanded reliance on foreign energy. New policies such as the rationing of energy through carbon credits will simply add to the misery of the middle and lower classes.

Democrats have proposed a number of policies that would change the business world we live in, including serious discussion of the nationalization or semi-nationalization of the healthcare industry, the energy industry, and the banking industry. Chavez’s Venezuela in red, white and blue may become a reality.

Having government which has managed to bankrupt social security, drive the educational system into chaos, has little understanding of how technology is developed or how long it takes to develop commercially viable solutions to our energy needs, and seems to think it has the power to create solutions by fiat not only regulate but run one of the industries critical to the country’s health and wellbeing is the worst possible solution to the current energy crisis.

The Democrats argue that the energy industry is run by greedy, power hungry companies bent on creating the largest possible profit. They will get no argument from me. However, those greedy companies realize they create their biggest possible profit by developing and providing the goods and services the public wants at the best possible price.

I would much rather have a greedy company who understands how the market works and seeks to create its profit through production and development than to have the industry run by an incompetent, greedy, power hungry government bent on using its power and resources to control what I do, how I do it, and when I do it.

This election isn’t so much about the presidential candidates as it is about the control of Congress. Obama and McCain are close to one another on many issues and the President has limited powers. If the Democrat Party gains enough seats to enact their agenda without serious opposition, the only difference between Obama and McCain will be in judicial nominations and the use of the veto. If the Democrats have enough seats to override vetoes, the presidential election is about judicial nominations only.

The real power struggle in this election is for dominate control of both houses of Congress. If the Democrat Party racks up enough seats in both houses to pass any legislation they desire, veto or not, business and salespeople are going to have a very rough four years ahead. The only real hope business has should the Democrats prevail in the numbers projected is that the damage they wreck can be reversed.

April 24, 2008

Guest Article: “Recession Proof Your Sales Organization,” by Thomas A Freese

Recession Proof Your Sales Organization
By Thomas A Freese

What happened to the glory days of selling, where new prospect opportunities were abundant, dot-com companies were spending money in all directions, and sales organizations exceeded their revenue targets by two, and sometimes, three-fold?

Well, guess what? Economic conditions have changed. With the threat of recession looming on the horizon, new prospects have all but disappeared, existing customers have tightened their budgets, and most of the “low hanging fruit” has already been picked.

Where does that leave sales organizations?

The natural tendency is to panic. With the bottom line in jeopardy, many companies are now scrambling to reduce headcount and cut back on expenses. As a result, edicts have gone out stating that there will be no more off-site meetings, salespeople can only travel when absolutely necessary, and some companies have even put a moratorium on logo golf shirts.

Of course, corporate executives are also looking for ways to boost revenue. That usually means turning up the heat on the field sales organization to produce better numbers…or else! But increasing the pressure on the sales organization doesn’t usually increase revenue. A full-court press might bring in a few short-term sales, but at the end of the day, customers don’t respond well when they feel pressured into buying.

Once the initial panic subsides, and short-term corrective measures have run their course, companies need to step back and evaluate their sales readiness.

Over the last ten years, selling goods and services for the most part has been relatively easy. I liken it to investing in the stock market during the same period. With the exception of a few downward blips, investors could have made their stock picks by throwing darts at the newspaper and still brought home record returns. As the old adage says, “When the tide comes in, all the boats go up.”

Well, the tide certainly came in for salespeople during the 1990’s. Along with the evolution of the Internet, the world’s economy experienced an economic boom that was unprecedented in modern history. As a result, thousands of new companies sprang up, backed by tons of venture capital, offering huge stock options and significant incentives to salespeople who were willing to jump ship and take a chance on hitting a home run.

Those salespeople who were smart enough (or lucky enough) to get in and out at the right time are probably relaxing on a private island somewhere, sipping pina coladas and wondering what the working class is doing today. For the rest of us, the glory days of selling are long gone.

As the dust settles, sales managers should take a few moments and review what is to be learned from this upheaval. The most glaring lesson is the realization that during the best of times, sales organizations tend to get complacent when it comes to sales skills. Think about it. In the 1970’s and early 80’s, Fortune 100 giants like IBM, Xerox, and Merrill Lynch set the standard when it came to establishing training programs to develop the professional selling skills of their respective sales organizations.

Over the last ten years, however, enhancing the professional skills of the field sales force has been a corporate nice-to-have. And why? Let’s be honest. When salespeople are achieving their sales goals, why should anyone worry about selling skills? Similarly, when a salesperson’s resume shows they have a track record for hitting their numbers, it is assumed that they have sound professional selling skills.

But do they? It’s easy to fill up the sales forecast and close business when the economy is booming. But what about when times get lean? What are your salespeople doing now to engage new prospects to increase their sense of urgency? What are they doing to establish credibility with cautious prospects and fend off competitors who have become even more desperate? What are they doing to minimize objections and move sales process forward toward closure? What are they doing to leverage their strategic partners to increase both mindshare and marketshare?

Most of the sales training dollars invested over the past decade were spent on rolling out sales automation programs—to improve forecast accuracy and improve the efficiency of the sales organization. But what about making the individual salesperson more effective? Oops! Seems we forgot about that. Just look around your organization. Even if you have good people, chances are good they are each attacking the sales process differently—oftentimes, based on their experience from the past ten years. Oops again! Remember, the economy has changed and we are no longer selling into a market environment where there are easy pickings.

There’s no need to assign blame. There is, however, an opportunity to recognize that the best way out of an economic recession is to increase the effectiveness of your salespeople, so they can sell their way out. For many companies, this means going back to basics and improving the professional selling skills of their sales organizations.

When my first book, Secrets of Question Based Selling, came out, some people thought, “Who needs sales skills when business is booming?” Now that the pendulum has swung the other way, corporate managers are suddenly wondering, “Who needs sales automation tools and complex spreadsheets when the forecast is empty?”

Thomas A. Freese, president of QBS Research, Inc., is recognized as one of the foremost authorities on strategic sales methods and buyer motivation.  His website is www.qbsresearch.com

April 17, 2008

Update to “Sorry, Folks, It Isn’t the Economy”

Just a quick update to my post from yesterday. I gave three examples of salespeople who weren’t letting the economy be an excuse for not reaching their numbers. I didn’t identify my three coaching clients by name simply because I had not asked their permission.

Well, one asked me to let folks know who he is–he’s obviously proud of his accomplishments as he well should be. The business banker I mentioned in the first example of one of my coaching clients who is busting numbers is Jacques Jourdan, business banker with Chase Business Banking on Long Island. Jacques is an excellent example of someone who isn’t letting the economy be an excuse for not making his quota. As a matter of fact, as mentioned yesterday, Jacques was the number one business banker in his area last month and is well on his way to doing it again this month.

Again, despite the economy, there a lot of people and companies out there that need, want, and can afford your products and services. You just have to be like Jacques and find ways to get in front of them that they respect and will respond to.

By the way, if you are a business owner, manager or independent professional in the Long Island area and need a business loan, equipment financing, line of credit, checking or savings account, or any other banking product or service, Jacques is a good guy to know–and hay, he just happens to be one of the leading business bankers in your area. You can get in touch with him at jacques.a.jourdan@chase.com.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.