Sales and Sales Management Blog

December 29, 2008

Looking Forward to a Great 2009

Filed under: sales,selling,Uncategorized — Paul McCord @ 10:43 am
Tags: , ,

As we come to the end of another busy year, we’re all looking forward to 2009-some apprehensively, others with great expectations.  Whatever your hopes and dreams about the coming year, nothing good will happen if you don’t make it happen.  The old truism that hope isn’t a strategy is truer in today’s economy than ever before.

Here at McCord Training we have a number of new projects in the works for the coming year-as well as continuing many of the projects we’ve been engaged in for the past few years.

  • I’ll continue to work with the top article sites such as Eyes On Sale, Salesopedia, Sales Gravy, Insightory, Sales HQ, Sales Dog, The Customer Collective, AllTop, Smart Draw, and The World’s Best Sales Blogs.  I want to thank each of these great article and blog sites for featuring my work and giving me the opportunity to reach more sales producers and leaders.
  • In late spring or early summer my next book, Connected: Turn Your Connections into Your Most Powerful Business Building Tool, will hit the streets thanks to my publisher, Sales Gravy Press.
  • The Sales Corporation and Jonathan Farrington are finalizing The Global Sales Council, “a very small, select group of the most respected sales and leadership experts on the planet, who are all committed to taking their expertise and their solutions to a far wider global market” of which I am proud to be a member.  You’ll be seeing a great many initiatives from us over the coming months.
  • In addition, I’ll continue to be a contributing member of Top Sales Experts, a larger group of top sales and management experts.
  • My seminar and workshop schedule kicks off on Jan 12 with a national seminar for Lorman Education Services on how to manage prospect accounts to keep prospects engaged in the sale and to lead them to making a purchasing decision.  You can get more information on the teleseminar, as well as registering for it here.  Almost immediately, that seminar will be followed up with a seminar for the Center for Sales Excellence.  From there, we have a strong schedule of public, association, and corporate seminars and workshops lined up-but not so many that we can’t work with your company or association also.  Just give us a call or shoot us an email and let us set something up for your organization.
  • My Sales and Sales Management Blog will continue to be syndicated to a number of publications such as Fox Business News, Hoovers, Nielsen Media, The Chicago Sun Times, Reuters, and others.  Again, I wish to thank these fine publications for honoring me with their support.
  • We are also working on a comprehensive prospecting and personal marketing CD set that should be available by late spring.  This will be a 10 hour set that addresses a number of issues of how to find and connect with prospects from generating referrals, to networking, to creating public visibility and an expert reputation, to building marketing partnerships, to, gads, cold calling, to maintaining a prospect’s attention and interest once you’ve connected with them. 

Certainly, as the year progresses, there will additional new projects, clients, and challenges, but as 2009 is shaping up, it will be another busy and productive year for McCord Training and myself.  I want to thank all who have taken the time to read my articles, books, and blog, my clients, and those salespeople and sales leaders who have communicated via email, phone, or in person.  Again in 2009, I welcome you comments, your suggestions, your questions, and your requests, whether via phone, email, snail mail, or on the blog.  I love hearing from you and look forward to hearing from more of you in the coming year.

I’m off until the 2nd.  Have a wonderful and save New Year.

December 16, 2008

Article of the Year–I Need Your Vote

Top 10 Sales Articles site has just announced the 12 finalists for Article of the Year.  I’m proud to say that my article “Why Decision Makers Hate Cold Calls” is one of the 12.  Each article nominated was voted Article of the Month for one of the past 12 months.  Each competed against hundreds of articles that were then narrowed down to the top 10 sales articles for each week, from which came the Article of the Month for that particular month.

Now the voting starts.

The Article of the Year will be decided by reader votes.  The competition is tough.  Among the monthly winners, which are now competing for Article of the Year, are articles by Zig Ziglar, Ivan Misner, Jill Konrath, Keith Rosen, and other top trainers.

I need your help-I need your vote.

But even if you don’t vote for my article, head over to Top 10 Sales Articles and register your vote for the article you believe to be the best of the year.

The Article of the Year is a prestigious award that all 12 winners would love to have.  Help me-or the author of your choice-win.

Top 10 Sales Articles 'Article of the Year' nominated author

October 6, 2008

Unabashed Self Promotion

I am honored and pleased that two of my articles were chosen as “Article of the Week” in September by Top 10 Sales Articles, and one, Why Decision Makers Hate Cold Calls, has been selected as the Article of the Month. My other article that was selected as an Article of the Week winner during September was Never a Cold Call, Always and Introduction. In addition, Jonathan Farrington, Moderator at Top 10 Sales Articles, informed me that I am the first and only author whose material has been selected twice in the same month as a weekly winner.

If you’re not familiar with Top 10 Sales Articles you should be. The site has a team of sales experts such as Farrington, Dr. Greg Stebbins, Lee Salz and others who judge sales and sales management articles from the top sales article sites on the net such as Eyes On Sales, Salesopedia, Sales Gravy, The Sideroad, and several other sites.

Competition is stiff with articles from such training luminaries as Tony Alessandra, Jill Konrath, Colleen Stanley, Charles H. Green, Harvey MacKay, Jeff Thull, Kelley Robertson, Dave Stein, Linda Richardson, Brian Tracy, Zig Ziglar, and dozens of other great trainers and sales experts.

To win article of the week twice in a single month is a great honor—and to win article of the month even more so.

You can find some of the best sales and management training material published during the week at Top 10 Sales Articles. Every Sunday afternoon a new set of the 10 best articles published during the previous week are featured, as well as the article of the week winner from the ten nominated articles from the prior week. Check it out—better yet, stick in your RSS reader or bookmark it and make it a regular part of your reading.

September 17, 2008

Hearing and Seeing is Believing? Hardly.

Communication is at the core of what we as salespeople do.  We have to find a prospect and then communicate who we are, what we do, how we can help them solve their problems or meet their wants and needs, and we have to do so in a manner that builds confidence, trust, and respect.

This should be a rational process-communicating factual information; demonstrating our trustworthiness by what we do, what we say, and the advice and guidance we provide the prospect; and putting the good of the prospect first.

As a rational process, we should be able to use logic, facts, and figures.  Our trustworthiness should shine through based the actions our prospect sees.  Our desire to seek what’s best for the prospect should be easily discernable based on the quality of our guidance and recommendations.

If only it were that easy.

Many of us make a critical mistake when we assume that our prospect hears what we’re saying and sees what we’re doing.

Unfortunately, that isn’t the case.  Prospects see and hear what they want to see and hear.

Nothing demonstrates this more clearly than the current presidential campaign.  There are hundreds of examples of people hearing and seeing what they want to hear and see, not what is actually being said or done.

Although I go on all day with examples, let me give a couple of examples, one from each campaign:

Pigs and Lipstick.  Everyone has seen the clip of Obama discussing the policies of John McCain during a campaign stop where he stated that you could put lipstick on McCain’s (i.e, Bush’s) policies and you’d still have a pig.

Within context it is obvious that Obama wasn’t speaking about Sara Palin.  He was speaking about the policies of John McCain.  But the reactions to this statement are very interesting.

The reactions of the Obama supporters at the event were the exact opposite of what Obama intended by the statement.  They began to laugh uproariously as soon as the word lipstick comes out of Obama’s mouth.  They immediately thought the statement was going to be an attack on Palin–because that’s what they wanted to hear.  They didn’t hear what Obama said; they heard what they wanted to hear.

Likewise, many of those opposed to Obama heard the same thing-an attack on Palin that didn’t exist-again, because that’s what they wanted to hear.

McCain and Economics. McCain has had the same issue arise with his comment that he wasn’t as well versed in economics as some other areas.  He never said he didn’t know anything about economics, he said he didn’t know as much about economics as he did other areas.

As with the Obama statement, the video clip makes it very evident the meaning of his words.

Many who oppose him didn’t hear his statement.  What they heard was that he doesn’t know anything about economics-again, they heard what they wanted to hear.

In both of the above instances there are those who honestly misunderstood the comments.  There are certainly others who intentionally misunderstand them and have twisted them for their own use.

Both men sought to communicate in a relatively straightforward manner.  McCain made a simple assertion that he didn’t know as much about economics as other subjects.  Obama used a common expression that at one time or another most all of us have used.

It can be argued that both men’s speech was ill conceived.  McCain should have known admitting he wasn’t as well versed in economics as other areas would open him up to criticism.  Obama’s use of the lipstick on a pig expression was ill timed due to Palin’s joke at the Republican convention.

But McCain and Obama are trying to communicate with other humans-and doing so with thousands of words everyday.  As such, each will find words coming out their mouths that are less than optimal to advance their respective causes.  Although both have speech writers, both must speak extemporaneously-and that can be dangerous ground for a presidential candidate–or a salesperson.

Each must take great care to phrase their statements precisely, to insure their statements are placed within a context that fully explains them and insulates them from being misunderstood.

We face the same obstacles Obama and McCain face.  We have prospects who hear what they want to hear, not what we say, who see what they want to see, not what we do.

“But,” you say, “they’re dealing in politics where listeners have pre-conceived ideas and agendas.  I’m selling copiers.”

That’s precisely the point.  Our prospects and clients also have pre-conceived ideas.  They also have agendas.  They also hear what they want to hear, see what they want to see.

Just as with McCain and Obama, we must be vigilant in our discussions with prospects and clients.  Fortunately, our job is easier.  McCain and Obama must understand and appeal to their immediate audience while formulating their words for a much larger audience that is present only via the eye of the camera and the microphone of the recorder.

That being said, we, like them, must be intimately tuned into our audience.  We must understand our prospect’s pre-conceived ideas and agendas if we want our words and our actions to communicate what we want to communicate, not what they want to hear or see.

September 7, 2008

Great Tips and a Free Audio Copy of My Referral Selling Book

Would you like a free unabridged audio copy of my bestselling book Creating a Million Dollar a Year Sales Income: Sales Success through Client Referrals? Well, you can have one courtesy of Jeb Blount, The Sales Guy. That’s every second of the 4 hours and 18 minutes of the book-and not only do you not pay the Audible cost of $17.95, you don’t pay a penny.

Jeb’s podcast series, The Sales Guy’s Quick and Dirty Tips, has arranged for you get a free download of my book in audio form from Audiable.com. Already have the book in hardback or audio form? Would you rather have another book? No problem. You can choose my book or a book by Nido Qubein, Tom Hopkins, Brain Tracey, Steven R. Covey, Harry Beckwith, Zig Zigler, Malcolm Gladwell, Jeffrey Giotmer, Seth Godin, or other top authors.

The best part is you also get great sales tips from Jeb. Hop on over to iTunes, Quick and Dirty Tips, or Sales Gravy, listen to Jeb give you some tips to help you sell and then listen to me tell you how to turn your business into a referral-based business, increase your income substantially, get off the ineffective, discouraging, and never-ending cold calling treadmill, and enjoy your job a whole lot more.

I want to thank Jeb for featuring my book on this offer-and encourage you, whether you get my book, another book, or no book, to head over to Quick and Dirty Tips and improve you sales business.

August 15, 2008

How to Destory Your Credibility without Even Trying

China wowed the world last Friday evening with their spectacular opening ceremonies for the Olympics. Those ceremonies had been in the works for two years. And for several years prior to that they had been building the sites, preparing their cities, and promoting not just the games but their image. These Olympics were to be their coming out party to showcase China to the world. This was the time for them to shine.

They promised these would be the best games ever held. Not only would the games be the best, the atmosphere and the spectacle would do both China and the Olympics proud.

Although the immediate lead up to the games was shaky with arrests of dissidents, preventing some foreign protesters from protesting, and a number of other issues, the games got off with a magnificent start. The world was wowed and hopes were high that these really would be the greatest games ever.

Then the trouble started–just little signs that maybe all was not what it seemed. Some of the opening night fireworks had been faked-just to make them stand out better on TV. Then the girl who sang wasn’t really the girl who sang. Then questions about the eligibility of some of their athletes. Now questions about whether the kids carrying out the Chinese flag were what the Chinese said they were.

There seems to be new questions daily about what was real and what that opening night wasn’t. As the questions mount, the press is looking more closely at not only the opening night ceremonies but at other aspects of the events–the Chinese teams and coaches, the officiating, and the presentation of China the country is putting on.

Most of the issues uncovered have been relatively minor-fireworks enhanced to make them standout better on TV, a girl substituted for the real singer because they felt the substitute represented China’s image better, kids from a single ethnic group representing all ethnic groups in the country because it was easier to get an existing troupe to perform.

Yet these small incidents accumulate and cause many to question just how much of what they are seeing is real and how much isn’t. Years of preparation and credibility building brought down in just a few days because of a series of small, meaningless, unnecessary incidents.

This on a big scale before the eyes of the world, but this same dynamic can destroy our credibility just as quickly. Ours may not be fakery. Ours may not be smoke and mirrors. Ours may simply be a series of small promises not kept, dates missed, phone calls unreturned. But the damage is the same. Those small promises, those unimportant dates, those too busy to return phone calls can destroy us more quickly than anything else because we think no one will notice. The problem is-they will notice.

August 11, 2008

A Sales Training Question

There has been much written lately about why sales training is so often ineffective and how to improve its impact on the sales team.  Many of these articles can be found on The Customer Collective.

In a recent blog post Dave Stein discusses his email exchange with Tim Sullivan, a director of Sales Performance International, regarding SPI’s public sales training seminar offerings.   Dave’s original question to Tim was how SPI could justify a public training seminar when both Dave and SPI agree that sales training has little impact unless there is an underlying change in the company’s business process.

I’m in agreement with Dave and Tim that in order to maximize the impact and value of sales training it must coincide with a fundamental change in the company itself.  That, however, is more wishful thinking than reality for the great majority of companies.

My experience as employee, trainer, and consultant is that few companies-especially small and mid-size companies–provide sales training.  Most companies provide-or at least try to provide-substantial and effective product training, but little or no sales training.  Many companies in fact believe that their product training is sales training.

Some companies do recognize the need for sales training and try to address it in a variety of ways from having their management team act as trainers to making available to their team a library of sales books, CD’s, and DVD’s to sending their team members to public training seminars.  A few-these tend to be the larger companies-try to aggressively address the issue of sales training either through a steady dose of outside training companies or their internal training department.  Some do it well, some do it very well, some are just spinning their wheels and spending large sums of money for little return.

Most salespeople are left to fend for themselves; hence the hundreds of thousands of sales books, thousands of sales training sites, personal coaches, and flood of CD’s, DVD’s, sales forums, article sites, and other training products and services targeted to the individual salesperson.  Frankly, most of these resources simply parrot one another, although there are a few that challenge conventional thinking and offer new takes on addressing the increasingly difficult tasks of finding, connecting with and selling today’s business and individual consumer.

Worse for the salesperson, the training industry in many ways is more an industry of credibility than effectiveness.  Business is often acquired through credibility–that is publishing books, writing articles, giving great presentations, being quoted more than the next person.  But having credibility isn’t the same as being an effective trainer.  One may be a great thought leader in training without having the ability to effectively train.  Likewise, one may be a great trainer capable of taking the thought leader’s insights and turning them into highly effective and behavior changing training, but not be able to make any original contributions of their own.  The former has great credibility and little effectiveness; the latter no credibility but great effectiveness.

The problem for salespeople-and ultimately for trainers-is how to create some semblance of a comprehensive, workable, and effective training regimen out of this vast assortment of possible training options.  Salespeople tend to pick up a book, watch a CD, or attend a training seminar based on what they feel they need at the moment.  Often it is simply desperation that moves them to seek out and engage training, hoping to address a critical gap in their sales business.

In a fragmented industry where each company or individual trainer is free to seek business where they can find it and how they will (sometimes with less than ethical means and fanciful claims), is there a way for an individual salesperson or a very small company to acquire the objective guidance and direction they need in order to create a comprehensive training program for themselves or their small team?

August 5, 2008

New Referral Book Coming Spring of 2009 from Sales Gravy Press

Sales Gravy Press Signs Best-Selling Author Paul McCord

Author and internationally recognized sales trainer Paul McCord has signed with Sales Gravy Press to publish his newest book, a follow-up work to his best-selling book on referrals, Creating a Million Dollar a Year Sales Income: Sales Success through Client Referrals (Wiley 2006).

Cape Coral, FL (PRWEB) July 31, 2008 — Author and internationally recognized sales trainer Paul McCord has signed with Sales Gravy Press to publish his newest book, a follow-up work to his best-selling book on referrals, “Creating a Million Dollar a Year Sales Income: Sales Success through Client Referrals” (Wiley 2006). The new book leads the reader through specific application strategies of the groundbreaking referral generation process laid out in Creating a Million Dollar a Year Sales Income.

“The initial book laid the groundwork for a disciplined, predictable, effective process for generating a large number of high quality referrals from each client,” McCord said, “and now I show salespeople how to apply those principles to specific situations. The first book demonstrated why the training they received hasn’t worked and walked them through a process that not only generates referrals, but generates a large number of high quality referrals. The new book goes even further and shows salespeople how to mine their database, turn cold calls into referred calls, and how to make giving referrals so easy they can generate 10, 15, 20 or more quality referrals from every one of their clients.”

With almost three decades under his belt as a salesperson, manager, business owner, and consultant, McCord’s experience and knowledge is both wide and deep. And like most of us, his life’s journey has taken some strange turns. “I thought I was going to be an academic, teaching Philosophy in a university,” he admits. “But as a doctoral student, it became clear that I didn’t have the personality for the academic life. I was more attracted to the real than the theoretical. I left the program and went into sales — and what’s more real than selling? Now, almost thirty years later, I’m back where I started–teaching, combining my love of working with and training salespeople and managers with the hard lessons I’ve learned over the years in the sales business.”

“Getting Paul on board is a huge win for Sales Gravy Press,” said Publisher, Jeb Blount. “Paul’s large following and proven success as an author are cornerstones in our mission to build a foundation of the brightest authors, speakers, thought leaders, and experts in the sales profession. We are just ecstatic that Paul has joined the Sales Gravy family.”

The new book will be released in the spring of 2009.

August 1, 2008

From Classroom to Paycheck–Making Sales Training Work

One of the most common complaints that I and other sales trainers get from both salespeople and companies is that sales training in any form, whether via book, workshop, seminar, or on-line course, has little or no impact for most of the men and women who take the training.  Unfortunately, their complaint is backed up by a number of studies that confirm that training does not change the behavior, attitudes, or results of the vast majority of salespeople.

Where does the fault lie for this miserable return on investment from training?  Does it lie with the sales trainer who performed the training?  Is the problem with the content of the training?  Maybe the issue is with the teaching methods employed?  Perhaps the real problem is with the salespeople themselves?

No doubt blame can be affixed to all of the above.  But there seems to be a more basic issue that is obvious but often overlooked.  Sales training is not simply an intellectual activity; by its very nature it demands behavior change.  To be effective, sales training requires that negative or ineffective behaviors be replaced with positive or effective behaviors.  Sales training has more in common with sports coaching than it does with academic teaching.  It is action oriented.  The lessons must be integrated into one’s behavior, not just filed away in one’s mental filing cabinet.

Changing behavior is different than absorbing information.  The basic problem with sales training is that the delivery format-even in a workshop that entails role play and group interaction-is predominately information oriented.

To be effective, sales training must be converted from information to behavior and that can’t be done in an hour or half-day or even a two or three day training session.  It takes time.  It takes repetition of action.  It takes making and learning from mistakes.  It requires the student be able to analyze performance, isolate mistakes, and institute new behavior that corrects the mistake.

It takes coaching.

There are a few salespeople in each training class that really seem to get the training.  They understand not just the concepts being trained; they understand how to implant those into their daily activity.  They also have the drive to work through the mistakes, the false starts, the missed opportunities, the disappointments they encounter while honing their newly learned skills.  They are the exception.  They are the few who management sees a positive change in and wonder why the others didn’t make the same changes.

Most of us don’t have the ability or the patience to implement the training, work through the issues, and hone the skills while consistently ‘blowing’ the implementation on our own.  We have to have help.  We have to have an outside observer, a sounding board, an encourager, a disciplinarian.  We have to have a coach.

Coaching has been a staple of sports for thousands of years.  Every athlete, from the youngest to the best player in the world, has a coach.  Their coach performs a number of duties but the primary duty is to oversee behavior change.  Teach information, yes.  Discipline, yes.  Encourage, yes.  But all of those are supplements to the primary goal-behavior change.

A few years ago a friend of mine, a minor league baseball player, was trying to improve his prospects of being promoted to the majors.  One area where he thought he could add value to his game was learning to bunt.  Not a power hitter, he needed some additional ways to help his team and bunting could be one.  He read several books and watched videos of a number of the game’s top bunters.  After reading the best books and watching the best bunters could he bunt?  No.  He had the concepts, but he didn’t have the behaviors.  So, he headed to the field with his hitting coach.  Over the course of weeks-and untold hours of work-his bunting skills improved markedly.  But they still weren’t major league quality.  He ended up hiring a bunting coach during the off season that could spot the tiny mistakes and negative behavior in his bunting technique and help him replace those actions with the positive actions that would result in success.  It took him almost a year and a half to become a really good bunter-almost three years to become a top bunter.  Translating what he learned into actions, into behaviors, was a long-term process that required a great deal of practice and coaching–and lots of blown opportunities in games.

Selling is no different.  Knowledge in sales is useless unless you use the knowledge, and that comes in the form of action-whether that action is instituting the referral generation process, dealing with those pesky objections, or closing the sale.  And just as with an athlete, translating the information into action requires coaching.

If you want the sales training you or your teams engage in to ‘work,’ that is to instill positive behavior and eliminate negative behavior, you must have a coach.

Individual salespeople must find their own coach, whether through a formal paid coaching arrangement with a professional trainer/coach, their manager, or another member of their team.

More and more sales trainers are including group or individual coaching in their corporate sales training proposals.  Some trainers are including ‘coaching the coach’ segments into their training proposals where they train the management team to be the team’s coach.  Some companies are simply relying on their management team to coach without formal coaching training for the particular sales training that was just delivered.

Sales training doesn’t work if it is information oriented only.  Sales is a contact sport.  It requires salespeople to learn not just information but to perform certain actions, and those actions don’t come naturally or easily for most of us.

Sales training can have a high degree of success for you or your sales team.  Not on its own, but in conjunction with active coaching.  Whether you’re an individual salesperson or a manager looking to train your team, if you’re not going to back the training up with active coaching, you may as well save your money.  However, if you choose to add coaching to the training mix, you’ll see a significant change in your sales performance-and your paycheck.

July 30, 2008

Interview with NYT Best-selling Author Linda Richardson about Her Newest Book, Perfect Selling

Linda Richardson has released her New York Times best-seller, Perfect Selling. This short, easy to read book deals with her 5-step process to creating a successful sales encounter.

linda-richardson-interview

Perfect Selling (McGraw Hill) is available at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Borders, and all fine booksellers.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,396 other followers