Sales and Sales Management Blog

October 18, 2011

Why Should You Ask Yourself Why?

Filed under: business,sales,selling,small business — Paul McCord @ 9:24 am
Tags: , ,

As I was preparing to post this article I discovered an article by my friend Anthony Iannarino that deals with similar issues from an organizational standpoint.  Sometimes serendipity kicks in and you discover you’re on the same wavelength as someone else.  I encourage you to read Anthony’s take on asking why.

Why did you lose that sale?

Why did that prospect insist on such a deep discount?

Why weren’t you prepared to answer that objection even though you’ve heard it before?

Why did your best client decide to “try” your competitor for his current order?

Why can’t you get to that great prospect even though you’ve tried for almost two months?

Why is one of the most important and powerful questions we can possibly ask ourselves.  It is also one that we so often seek to avoid because the answers can make us really, really uncomfortable.

No matter our experience or success level, we never reach perfection.  All of us make mistakes; we all fail in big and little ways; we all need to improve; we all have weaknesses that cost us business.

Overcoming these issues and weaknesses isn’t pleasant for any of us. 

It’s much easier to chalk up our losses to a bad day and move on.

Certainly it’s easier to simply move on, but that’s a sure way to fail again in the future.

The most powerful question you ask is why.  That simple question is more important than any sales training you can get.  It is more important than any sales “secret” you can learn.  It is more important than any sales tips anyone can give you.

If you consistently ask “why” and then diligently dig to discover the answer, your sales will dramatically improve.  This isn’t a quick fix, but it is the single most effective change strategy you can employ.

April 15, 2011

2011 Sales and Marketing Success Conference—Improve Your Skills and Help Japan at the Same time

Get out your calendar and start making plans for the week of Monday, May 9 through Friday, the 13th.  During those five days you’ll have the opportunity to attend up to 35 incredible webinar sessions—7 every single day—presented by 35 of the top sales minds in the world. 

Each session will be a quick but highly targeted 30 minutes.

Who are some of these presenters?  Well, there’s Dave Kurlan, Jill Konrath, Kelley Robertson, Colleen Francis, Linda Richardson, John Doerr, myself, and many others.  Topics covered will range from Sales 101 Isn’t Enough: Advanced Selling Capabilities For Outselling Your Competition to 7 Habits of Highly Effective (Social) Salespeople to Successfully Profiting from the New Buying Cycle to my session on Build a Successful Business on Referrals by Knowing Who Your Client Knows and, of course, many, many more.

You can see the whole list of sessions HERE

And here’s even better news—when you attend any given session you’ll be helping the Red Cross in their mission in Japan.

Jonathan Farrington, the host of the conference says,

Just four weeks after the Magnitude 9.0 Tohoku earthquake and a tsunami which delivered 46ft waves, we learn that the death toll is likely to top 25.000, and recovery is going to take not years, but possibly decades, maybe even a generation, at a cost of at least $250 billion.

This is our opportunity to show that the sales community – so often derided for being shallow and materialistic, amongst other things – actually has a very big heart.

We plan to charge just $5 registration fee per presentation, and we are limited to 1000 guests per session, so places will be allocated on a “first come – first served” basis.

Can I count on your support? Together we can make a worthwhile *contribution to the people of Japan.

That’s right, it only costs $5 to attend any one session and 100% of those dollars will be donated to the Red Cross specifically for Japan.  At the end of each session you’ll be given an opportunity to donate an additional $1, $5, or $10 if you so wish.

Here is a tremendous opportunity to contribute to the efforts in Japan and get great training at the same time. 

What a great deal!!!

I encourage you to seriously consider attending my session Friday, May 13 at noon Eastern time as I’ll be giving you the tools you’ll need to do the detective work to figure out exactly who your client knows that you know you want to be referred to—and knowing that will allow you to both greatly increase the number of referrals you get and, more importantly, get referrals to prospects that you know are great prospects for you.

Here is the registration page for my session.

Don’t miss this fantastic opportunity to help yourself improve your sales while helping those who are in desperate need of help.

April 14, 2011

A Tale of Three Villages

This was related to me by a sales executive—I’ll refer to him as Robert–who swears it is a true story.  Although I have his permission to use his name, I’ve chosen not to for as you will see, the story is not complimentary to the company he was working for (and it’s too pleasant a Spring to worry about a law suit).

Like many other companies, Robert began, we had gone through a terrible year in 2008. 

I had joined the company as chief sales officer at the beginning of 2007, just a very few months before the economy really began to hurt our sales.

During the course of the year we had cut back on everything—even to the point that office supplies were monitored, hourly employees were forbidden to work overtime, a hiring freeze was instituted which not only meant that no new positions could be created but if someone quit or were terminated we couldn’t replace them.  There were no merit raises, and, of course, there we no bonuses.  Travel, training, meeting, and other “non-essential” budgets were greatly reduced if not entirely eliminated.

We in the sales department were under a great deal of pressure to bring in business—any business.  At first, profit margins were watched with an eagle eye, but after a few months the goal was to get a sale at virtually any price.  The entire sales staff was working under tremendous pressure.  Two satellite sales offices were closed during the year as well as one branch office.  The national and all regional sales meetings were cancelled.

Despite the emphasis on bringing in business at any cost, sales were still down by almost 20% for the year—and 2009 looked like it would be even worse.  The company posted a loss for the first time in almost 15 years and we knew that the following year would be an even bigger loss the way things were going.

During the first quarter of 2009 all the department heads and executives were called in for a strategy meeting.  The goal was to figure out what could be done to stop the bleeding.  I was to lay out in detail what was needed in the sales department. 

When it finally came my turn to present, I started with an overview of 2008’s sales and the current projections for 2009.  I then wanted to make a case for funding an aggressive training program starting immediately.  During the previous year our one in-house trainer had quit and wasn’t replaced.  We instituted some training during weekly sales meetings but that was totally inadequate.  For several years prior to the recession when business was really good the company had cut back on the amount of training it provided.  Business was coming in and frankly they didn’t see a reason to spend the dollars.  As I said, we had a company trainer but he wasn’t really a sales trainer although he had gone through one of the major sales training systems and was our “official” sales trainer so to speak, supplemented by our branch and regional managers and on occasion me.

Rather than giving a straight forward argument for increased training of the sales team and the associated expenditure, I decided to tell a story that I thought might illustrate the need better than simple facts.

I stood up and started:

“Around the mid to last half of the 19th century in the Midwest farming was becoming the backbone of communities.  Small farming villages were constantly forming as more and more farmers developed their farms.  Often these communities were founded on a river.

“In one area in particular at about the same time, three farming villages were founded, each on a fork of the same river. 

“Each village was thriving as more framing families moved into their area.  Over the years, additional commercial interests began to move into each community.

“For many years life was good.

“But from the beginning, each community took a different view of the fork of the river they lived on.

“The first village understood that the river was the source of their livelihood.  The village council made sure that the river was well maintained.  Any trash that was found in the river was removed.  If sand, silt, or rocks began to build up around the banks of the river, it was cleared out.  About every couple of decades they dredged the river if they needed to.

“But the elders of the second and third villages didn’t see a need to pay much attention to the river as the river was always there.  Sure, over the years the silt and sand had accumulated.  The river was shallower than it had been but it was also broader, so it had just as much water as ever.  They thought the first village’s efforts to keep their fork of the river narrow and deep a silly waste of time.  Life was good–why invest in something that didn’t need to be done?

“But then a year of drought came.  The first village barely noticed that the rains had ceased as their river still ran strong and deep and provided all the water they needed.  But the other two villages began to see their forks of the river begin to dry up.  At first it was just a bit of bigger semi-sandy beach.  Then there were mud flats that seemed to go for hundreds of yards before there was any water.

“The drought didn’t break in the second or the third years. 

“By the end of the second year the first village had seen a noticeable decrease in the flow of their fork of the river.  Even so, they had plenty of water and had no fear that if the drought lasted another year or even two that they’d be in any real trouble.

“The people in the second and third village were in very different shape.  Their forks of the river were on the verge of drying up completely after the years of neglect. 

“The village councils of both villages finally had no choice to face the crisis. 

“Both villages talked about their options—they could sacrifice and pay the price to do the work they should have been doing all along and invest in getting their fork of the river in shape to handle the drought, they could give up and move out of the village, or they could stay and hope that the drought relented before they were driven out.

“The people of the second village debated and debated and finally decided that as much as it would hurt short-term, they had no choice but to hire someone to come and help them save their fork of the river.  The sacrifice was painful—and it wasn’t quick, but finally it began to pay off and the water began to flow, each day the flow of water seemed to increase. 

“The people in the third village decided that the cost to deal with the river was just too great to bear.  They believed that the drought would abate and they would be able to delay any repairs to the river until times were better. During the fourth year of the drought the final residents of the third village moved away, leaving their small village and most of the surrounding farms to decay.

“Unfortunately, we have several competitors who, like the first village, didn’t fritter away the good years.  They maintained a high level of training for their people even though for many, us included, it seemed a waste of time and money.  They are now reaping the rewards of that investment.  Some have even seen their sales increase during this downturn.

“We now have to decide if we’re going to be like the second village that was willing to pay the price in the short-term to rectify past neglect–or whether we’re going to hope against hope as the third village did that somehow we’ll make it through.

“It’s our choice—and our responsibility.  Where do we go from here?”

 

I’d like to say that my little story had the desired effect, Robert said.  It didn’t.  We limped along through 2009 and most of 2010.  The loses grew larger each month. 

I eventually left out of disgust. 

The company is still hanging on but is looking for someone, anyone, to purchase them.  Most of the executive group that was there for my story is gone also.

Would things have been different if we’d made the decision to ratchet up our training?  Of course I can’t say for sure, but I’m willing to bet they would be very different.  We had a good product.  We had some good salespeople.  We didn’t have the right support in terms of training and coaching to help them at a really difficult time.

Since then I’ve changed my focus, Robert ended.  My team is 100% focused on gaining and implementing skills—and every manager is required to learn how to coach their team members.  No longer will I get myself in a situation where my river is going to silt over and die.

 

I thought Robert’s story both timely and relevant to many a company right now. 

I hope if your company didn’t follow the example of the first village that you at least joined the second village in digging deep and sacrificing to dredge your river to get the saving water flowing again.  If you’re with the third village, well, good luck.

September 28, 2010

Are Your Sales Managers Sabotaging Your Sales Training?

Yesterday the CEO of a mid-size financial services company complained that no matter how carefully they designed their sales process and the accompanying training, they have been unsuccessful in establishing a consistent, long-term implementation of the process throughout the company.

Yesterday certainly wasn’t the first time I’ve heard this lament—and it certainly won’t be the last.

There are a number of possible reasons for sales training failure from treating sales training as an event instead of an ongoing behavior change process, to salespeople who view attending sales training sessions as torture, to the company’s failure to provide follow-up coaching for the sales team.  All of these are real issues that can negate any potential success you might experience from your investment in sales training.

But there is another cause of training failure that isn’t addressed as often but can be more destructive to your company’s training efforts than any other single factor—your sales managers.

Are your sales managers reassuring their charges that, “yes, you have to go to the training, but don’t worry; just go and when you get back, sell the way you’ve always sold?”  Maybe they don’t believe in the training you’re giving and are intentionally training their team in different processes and tactics? 

If you fail to get full buy-in from your sales management team to the specific training you are presenting, you will not have comprehensive and universal implementation of the training. 

Your frontline sales managers who work with their team members have more influence on how your salespeople sell than anyone else—more than senior executives, more than middle sales management, more than the training department, more than HR, more than the expensive sales trainers you hire.

If they don’t believe, the salespeople won’t believe.  If they don’t reinforce the messages, the strategies, and the tactics, those occasional training sessions will be nothing more than expensive exercises in futility.

How do you get all of your sales managers on the same page?

Before you ever put a salesperson in a training workshop or seminar, each and every manager must have gone through the management version of the training.  Each manager must understand what the company’s comprehensive, unified sales process is and how the particular training that is scheduled fits in the big picture; what short and long-term results are to be expected; what their job is in reinforcing and coaching the training; and what criteria will be used to determine the success or failure of the training.

Most of all, each manager must believe in the process and strategy.  .

Whether the training is presented by an in-house trainer or by a professional trainer brought in from outside, each segment of training should consist of a management segment designed to gain manager buy-in and to give them the tools and knowledge they will need to coach sellers once they are back at the office and a segment for salespeople that is attended by their managers.

And although the initial cost of training in terms of both time and money will increase, the long-term result will be reduced waste of training dollars and increased sales.  That wished for unified sales process will begin to become a reality because the biggest determent to success has been turned into the biggest promoter of success.

September 21, 2010

Prospecting Lessons from Some of the Biggest, Best Known Sales Training Companies in the World: They Won’t Like What We Can Learn From Them

“My name is Paul McCord and I’m a recovering sales trainer.”

OK, I’m not to that point yet, but if the prospecting calls and emails I’m getting from some of the biggest and “best” sales training companies in the world is an indication of the effectiveness of our industry, I may be repeating that line soon.

What is one of the most basic prospecting rules that every sales trainer, sales manager, and sales book preaches (even my dogs know this one by heart)?  Never make a prospecting call without having at least minimal knowledge of the suspect you’re calling–and preferably having done thorough research on them. 

I get prospecting calls and emails all the time.  Of course I know a great percentage of salespeople and business owners aren’t adhering to this rule.

But who else isn’t adhering to it?

Well, in the last month and a half I have received one prospecting phone call and two prospecting emails from salespeople for three of the biggest, baddest, most well known sales training companies in the world.  In all three instances the salespeople were trying to sell me—yep, sales training.

The salesperson that made the phone call started the call by giving me their name, the name of their company and then asking me if I’d heard of their company.  I gave a positive response.  Next I was asked if I or anyone else in my company made sales calls.  My response was again positive.  The salesperson then asked me if we were finding the economy tough.  My response was once more positive.  So, the salesperson asked me three questions that they knew I was probably going to give a positive response to, getting me on a “yes” roll.

The next question was a problem.  After a short explanation about what the salesperson’s company does, I was asked if I and any salespeople in my company had ever had formal sales training.  At this point I informed the salesperson that McCord Training was also in the sales training industry and that I probably wasn’t a great prospect for her and her company.

Her response?  She laughed, apologized for calling, and hung up.

The two emails were similar to the phone call.  The sellers gave me background on their company, gave me an idea of how their training could increase my company’s sales, and asked me to respond with a time for the salesperson to call me.  Conveniently I was given the choice of a couple of days and times or I could suggest a better time if I wanted.

These were not untrained salespeople.  These were not sellers who were hired by some rinky-dink fly-by-night company.

Not at all.

These were salespeople from three of the biggest sales training companies in the world.  All three are sales household names.  All three are among the 10 biggest sales training companies in the world.  Two are in the top five, maybe the top three.

These are supposed to be the best of the best, at least that’s what they tell prospects.

Embarrassing for them and their companies to say the least.  Embarrassing for all of us in the sales training industry as these sellers reflect on all of us when they make these stupid mistakes.

So what lessons can we learn from these top tier sales training companies?

  1. Don’t assume your salespeople are well trained.  If the salespeople of the “top” sales training companies aren’t well enough trained to not make the most basic prospecting mistakes, can you assume your salespeople are better trained and not making these mistakes?
  2. Don’t assume your salespeople are living their training.  Even if your salespeople have been thoroughly trained, don’t assume they are living it.
  3. How your salespeople sell reflects directly on your company.  These salespeople didn’t just embarrass themselves, they embarrassed their company—and not just because of the industry the company is in.  When your salespeople demonstrate ignorance, laziness, or any other negative trait, prospects draw the same conclusions about the company they represent.
  4. Once is not enough.  Your salespeople need consistent training reinforcement and follow-up.  A single training session isn’t going to change the behavior of your sales team.  Training must be on going.  It must be consistently reinforced and coached. 

Yes, all of this means you have to invest real time and real dollars in training your sales team—but you just got a free lesson from three of the world’s top sales training companies.

July 26, 2010

In Sales Training, New Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Better–In Fact, It Probably Isn’t

Filed under: career development,sales,sales training,selling — Paul McCord @ 2:08 pm
Tags:

“Hey, Paul, what do you have new and exciting for me?”

“I’ve had trainers come in and do sessions on cold calling, referrals, and networking and just recently had an all day session on using Social Media.  I’m really looking for something really new and cutting edge that can really get my people excited.  Do you have any training like that?”

“You’re not telling me anything new.  Isn’t there anything new and exciting that’s going to ignite sales?  We’ve had all the standard stuff; we need something radical, something really cutting edge.”

I hear these comments more often that I’d like as there is a segment of the population that is always looking for the newest, most innovative, original prospecting, selling, presentation, and customer service methods, techniques and strategies.  And even those who aren’t asking for something unusual or different are attracted by the idea of finding something really new, different, ground-breaking.

We live in a world obsessed with the new, original and different.  The old is so yesterday; the new is what’s going to give us the ANSWERS to the great questions of sales and marketing.

But there’s a serious problem with this drive for new, different, and unique.  A lot of the new is nothing but crap and a lot of the old are solid, proven methods and techniques that work because they are in line with how humans think and act.

As a graduate student I encountered this same type of thinking.  For anyone seeking to become a tenured professor, producing new and original material is mandatory.  The problem is there isn’t that much new and original worth the paper it’s written on.  But producing worthwhile material isn’t the key to academic success—being able to defend the material—no matter how flimsy the defense or how outrageous the material—is the key to staying around long enough to become tenured.

Now, years later, I find the same situation in the training arena.  As trainers we have to make a name for ourselves in order to get the training and speaking contracts, in order to sell more books, in order to demand larger and larger fees.

How do we make a name for ourselves?  One way is through producing new and original material; new methods, new strategies, new concepts, new ideas, or new principles.   And just as with the academic, it really doesn’t make any difference if the new ideas, concepts, strategies and methods work as long as we can convince enough people that it is worth paying the price to give it a shot.  It’s even better if we can get a concept, principle, strategy or process named after us—that just might be the real ticket to the big time.

The problem is so much of this new and original is nothing other than the old put in a shiny new package which is often prettier but less effective than the old package—or, just as likely, pure old fashioned bullshit.

On the other hand, a great deal of what is considered old and dated is still the best thinking in a great many areas of sales and sales management.  Want some quality material?  Get yourself a copy of Think and Grow Rich, SPIN Selling, How I Raised Myself From Failure to Success in Selling, Solution Selling, or Major Account Sales Strategy.  Before reading the newest, hottest sales guru, spend some time reading Zig Ziglar, Brian Tracy, or Tom Hopkins.  Too old fashioned for your taste?  Well, they haven’t been around training salespeople and managers since God was just a boy because they don’t know what they’re talking about.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t pursue new avenues, new study, new thinking.  I believe we have a tremendous amount to learn about sales and marketing, about how people make decisions, how they purchase, how to connect and relate to them.  I think we’ve really only begun to plumb the world of sales and marketing.

And certainly there’s some great (and original) thinking going on today—look at Charlie Green, Dave Brock, Jill Konrath, Jonathan Farrington, Sharon Drew Morgan, and many others.  All of these men and women are contributing their original thought and helping us become better sellers, sales leaders and marketers.  But even within this illustrious group you’ll find the vast majority of their material builds on the best thinking of the past rather than trying to reinvent sales and marketing.

Don’t be conned by the claims of new, of ground-breaking, of revolutionary from the latest sales guru.  As Ecclesiastes says, there’s really nothing new under the sun.  Instead of seeking the new, seek the proven; instead of looking for the original, look for the effective; instead of trying to find the easy way, find the way that is ethical and works.

Just because it’s the old time religion doesn’t mean it won’t work in today’s marketplace; just as because it is new and different doesn’t mean it will work.  In fact, if it is new, original and ground-breaking, chances are it won’t work.

March 4, 2010

Consistency in Training Relates Directly to Consistency in Production

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul McCord @ 12:21 pm
Tags: ,

I had an interesting conversation on Friday with a sales executive for a mid-size company that produces accounting and HR software solutions for the manufacturing and medical industries regarding the inconsistency of training messages to the sales force within the company.  David’s concern is that although the company has what is supposed to be a sales process that is learned, perfected and used by every salesperson within the company, there is no consistency in the training or in the training messages they receive from the various training sources the company employs.  What, he wondered, is this inconsistency doing to the sales team?

Although David’s company isn’t unusual in the sense that many companies have an ‘official’ sales process that they mandate but don’t teach consistently, in my experience, David is unusual since so few salespeople or sales leaders ever question the consequences of presenting inconsistent training.

David’s company spends a great deal of money training each new hire on the sales process the company has adopted.  Each new hire will spend well over 100 hours during their first 60 days on the job in classroom and field training inn the process the company uses.  This includes a four day stint at an outside vendor’s training center.  Every new hire is sent to the training session, costing the company a significant investment –airfare, hotel, meals, the training company’s fee, as well as the new hire’s salary.  Lots of money goes into each new salesperson hired.

You’d think they would want to ensure those dollars were well spent.

You’d be wrong.

When the new hire finishes the basic training program, they go into their branch and from there receive the same additional training as any other salesperson in the company.  This additional training comes from their branch manager, the company training department, the occasional outside training session, and the company’s video and audio training library. 

Sounds pretty good so far.  Actually, it sounds like these salespeople get a consistent dose of training.

And they do.

Unfortunately, the additional training they receive not only doesn’t reinforce the initial training the company spent huge dollars on when the person was hired, much of it actually contradicts that training. 

Branch managers hear of some hot new idea and the next Monday they’re training their salespeople on it.

The training department attends a seminar that excites them and they immediately go back to their office and create a training program around it.

A company executive hears a great speaker and insists the company hire them for their next sales conference.

The sales library has all of the popular books and DVD’s on the market.

Little or no thought is given to how these training messages integrate with the company’s mandated sales process.  Training becomes nothing but a jumble of different messages that if any fit within the format of the company’s stipulated sales process, it is only by accident.

And what is the message all of this sends to the sales team?  Simply that they are free to pick and choose what they want to do since the ‘mandated’ sales process really isn’t mandated—it’s just a suggestion of a process they might consider using.

And then the management of the company wonders why all the training they do isn’t working.

Training is far more than simply exchanging information about a particular aspect of selling.  Training has far more to do with behavior change than it does information exchange.  Training doesn’t work for many companies because the behavior change is never implemented—it never has a chance to be implemented because the sales team is confronted with so many different—and often contradictory—behaviors that no one behavior is ever really learned before they are confronted with a new behavior.

This same lack of consistency is experienced by salespeople who must seek out their own training.  They too are confronted with a sea of training concepts and ideas that are often in conflict with one another. 

There are many sales processes that are viable.  There are a great many individual strategies and techniques that produce results.  But none of them will produce the desired results if they are not learned and implemented—if the right behavior isn’t ingrained so it comes naturally.  To learn a process to that point, what is often called unconscious competency, takes time, practice, and reinforcement.  If your company isn’t generating the results from training that you want to see, maybe the culprit isn’t the process or the strategies you want to use, but instead is the inconsistency of message your company is unconsciously sending your sales team.

November 12, 2009

Big Changes Coming to Sales Training?

I usually don’t use this blog as a forum to comment on posts on other blogs, although I do reference other posts when appropriate.  However, I want to point out a discussion that Dave Stein is having on his blog about the issues and changes currently taking place within the sales training industry and its corporate customer base.

To date Dave has posted two pieces of the discussion (I don’t know whether he intends to continue the discussion although I hope he does as I think he can flesh out many of the issues and potential solutions more fully and maybe bring in some other perspectives–possibly from large and small training companies as well as buyers). 

The first installment of the discussion is an interview he did with Tom Martin talking in fairly general terms about some the changes that need to take place to make sales training more effective and user friendly for companies and for trainers. 

In the second post, Dave delineates 9 major obstacles sales training, and more specifically sales trainers and training consumers, must overcome in the coming months and years such as the reactive nature of sales training consumption, moving consumption from the purchase of “tips” training to effective process training, and the necessity of trainers to be more insistent on post event coaching as the necessary element for the training to have the desired impact on the sales team.

As a lone wolf sales trainer that generally works within a narrow area—prospecting and personal marketing, I’ve certainly noticed the need for change within the industry.  There is still a significant segment of the market—whether talking about individual sellers or corporate purchasers—who are looking for the magic tips and tidbits that will magically change their pipelines.  They don’t want training, they want a motivator to come in with lots of hype and few tips and then they expect change.  Foolish? Yes, but also very common.

Equally frustrating is the discussion with buyers about follow up coaching or a training the coach segment.  Seems that many trainers are not educating prospects on the critical nature of managed follow up with training event attendees to make sure the appropriate behaviors are being instilled.  For decades one of the primary complaints from training buyers has been that training is in general ineffective.  That I believe is because of a misunderstanding of what a training event really is.  A training event is nothing more than information exchange but the goal is ultimately behavior change.  The behavior change doesn’t happen during the training event, it happens afterwards when the seller is back in the field—but it won’t happen for the vast majority of sellers unless they have support and guidance that must either come from the initial trainer, the seller’s manager, or the company’s training department.  Even though we know the result of training without follow up coaching, few are insisting that coaching or training the coach be a part of the contract.

Head over to Dave’s blog and spend some time there—both posts and the comments are well worth the time spent.

October 6, 2009

Guest Article: “Stop the Bleeding! Why an uneducated sales force is the biggest single drain on corporate profits,” by Dave Kahle

Filed under: sales,sales training,selling — Paul McCord @ 7:17 am
Tags: , , ,

Stop the Bleeding! Why an uneducated sales force is the biggest single drain on corporate profits
by Dave Kahle

The following scenario plays over and over again in every one of your sales territories every day. And it costs you hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.

I was working with one of my client’s salespeople. The client was an HVAC commercial contractor. The salesperson had an appointment with a prospect who had called and requested a visit.

As we introduced ourselves to the prospect, he said, “We added on office space to our building a couple years’ ago, but we never expanded the air conditioning capacity. We’d like to get an idea of what it would cost to do so now.”

The salesperson asked to see the space. There, he took out a tape measure and note pad, and dutifully measured the space and outlined it in the note book. Then, he asked to see the existing unit. The prospect took us up into the attic, and pointed out the unit which rested on a platform off to one corner.

The salesperson gingerly worked his way over to it, inspected it carefully, took some more notes, and slowly worked his way back to where we stood.

“I have everything I need,” he said. “Can I fax you a detailed quote in the next 24 hours?”

“Sure,” said the prospect. The salesperson prepared to leave, intent on going back to the office, working out the detailed quote, and then faxing it to the prospect.

I felt the need to intervene. “Can I ask a question?”

“Sure,” said the prospect.

“If you like the quote, what is the prospect of you placing an order in the next few weeks?”

“Oh, none at all,” he said. “The boss just wants to get an estimate. If it’s within reason, he’ll put it on the budget and do it sometime next year.”

“So,” I said, “you really don’t need a detailed proposal at this point, do you?”

“Not really. I just need a ballpark to give to the boss.”

I turned to the salesperson. “What’s a ball park price?”

“$3500,” he said.

The prospect thanked us, and we were on our way.

Let’s consider what happened.

The salesperson had never been trained in the basic sales competencies of asking good questions and qualifying the opportunity. Instead, he considered himself to be “a problem solver.” He looked for a problem, and intended to solve it by creating a detailed quote. Of course, the prospect didn’t want or need that quote.

If I had not intervened, the salesperson would have gone back to the office, and spent several hours preparing the quote. He would have faxed it to the customer, and considered himself to have done a fine job. At the end of the day, he would have thought of himself as a competent salesperson, having put in a good day’s effort. His manager would have seen the quote, added it to the list of potential business, and also considered it to be a good job, well done.

The truth was, of course, that the salesperson didn’t have a clue. While he thought he was doing a good job, he totally misread and mishandled the situation. He didn’t even know what he didn’t know. His view of his competency was based on a standard that was irrelevant.

The unvarnished truth is, that particular salesperson cost the company hundreds of dollars that day in time misapplied – a couple of hours spent in the office preparing a quote for an opportunity that didn’t really exist. Not only were there direct costs of the salesperson’s time misapplied, but there were also the opportunity costs of other real opportunities that were not generated by the salesperson wasting his time in the office. How many real valuable sales calls could have been made but were not because of the salesperson spending time in the office?

But those costs were invisible, hidden not only from his eyes, but also from the management and executives of the company. They saw a quote uncovered and delivered, instead of a sales opportunity misinterpreted and mishandled.

In this example, the salesperson had never been trained to qualify the opportunity. That’s just one example of the lack of appropriate training. Similar costs are routinely incurred in almost every sales call by untrained salespeople. Consider the cold calls on prospective customers that are mishandled. Or the opportunities with current customers that are never fully understood. On and on it goes.

That is the greatest single cost to your profitability. Multiply that one invisible mishandled sales call, times the number of calls each salesperson makes a day, times the number of salespeople in your organization, times the number of days in the year, and you begin to get a picture of the enormity of the cost.

And it’s not just time misapplied, as in this example. Imagine the costs of deals that should have been gained, and were not due to a lack of sales competencies. Multiply that times the same variables as above, and see what kind of number that brings you.

 

Clearly, uneducated, untrained salespeople are bleeding the profits from your business as rapidly as a burst aneurism.

It’s not their fault. In this case, for example, the salesperson learned his job by trial and error, and he naturally defaulted to a role with which he was comfortable. Since he was a technical person by nature, he chose to see every sales situation as a technical problem to solve. Naturally.

He just didn’t know any better. And the reason he didn’t know any better is that no one taught him. Far too many companies hope that their salespeople will somehow figure out how to do their jobs effectively on their own. Unfortunately that hope is misplaced, serving as a rationale to justify a lack of investment in their salespeople or ignorance in how to do so.

If that describes you, then you need to stop the bleeding before it’s too late. Educate your sales force in the basic sales competencies.

Dave Kahle has been the number  1 salesperson in the country for 2 different companies, in two distinct industries and selling situations.  He’s a high energy, intense, world-class speaker who has presented in  5 Canadian provinces, 7 Countries and 47 US States.  He has been in practice for  21 years, and in that time has authored  7 books, including Question Your Way to Sales Success , and 10 secrets of Time Management for Salespeople .  He has spoken to meetings and conventions of  86 associations, and has trained or consulted for 247 individual companies.  He writes and publishes an Ezine for salespeople and managers called “Thinking about Sales” which is distributed  48 times a year to over 30,000 opt-in subscribers.  Visit Dave’s website

May 26, 2009

It All Starts MONDAY!!

Do you like FREE?

Do you like WORLD CLASS?

Do you like making more MONEY?

Do you want to improve YOURSELF and YOUR SALES TEAM?

Then get ready, mark your calendars, and save the Sales and Sales Management Blog in your RSS reader because 53 of the best sales and management authorities in the world are coming to you beginning Monday, June 1.

And it’s all FREE.

Beginning Monday, the Sales and Sales Management Blog will address a critical sales or sales management issue each week this summer. 

And you won’t just be getting my take on these issues.

Each week I’ll be bringing in 4 of the top experts on the week’s subject.  Monday through Thursday you’ll get the guidance and wisdom of 4 world class experts and each Friday I’ll give my perspective.

53 of the most respected trainers and consultants the world has to offer tackling some of the most important sales and management issues of our day.

Monday’s Topic:  Using the Phone to Generate Business.

The experts:
Monday, June 1:  Wendy Weiss
Tuesday, June 2:  Jill Konrath
Wednesday, June 3:  Trish Bertuzzi
Thursday, June 4:  Art Sobczak
Friday, June 5:  Paul McCord

Who are some of the other incredible experts you’ll read this summer: 

Andrea Sittig-Rolf
Dr. Greg Stebbins
Randy Pennington
Mike Schultz
Anne Miller
Jonathan Farrington
Mark Hunter
Jeb Blount
Dr. Drew Stevens
Kevin Eikenberry

And over 40 more.

Save Sales and Sales Management Blog to your favorites

Or better yet, save it in your RSS Reader

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,814 other followers